Tibet Lost in Translation: Sovereignty, Suzerainty and International Order Transformation, 1904–1906

Amanda J. Cheney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2017.1305490
IF: 3.126
2017-04-10
Journal of Contemporary China
Abstract:How did Tibet become part of the modern Chinese state? Even today, as Tibet is an internationally recognized part of the People’s Republic of China, the evasive meaning of ‘Chinese suzerainty over Tibet’ is a reverberant point of contention in nationalist debates. The question of whether ‘suzerainty’ more strongly implicates Tibetan independence or Chinese sovereignty is a false controversy that has impeded progress in understanding China’s transition from empire to nation-state. This article examines Anglo–Chinese diplomatic negotiations following the 1904 British invasion of Tibet using newly uncovered Chinese archival documents to demonstrate the central role played by the appropriation and manipulation of international legal discourse in determining Tibet’s status in the international system and offers a generalizable theory of the mechanics of international order transformation.
area studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?