Abstract:Background: According to Bandura, individuals are able to violate their personal standards, without self-sanction, by using the psychological operations of moral disengagement. For Bandura et al., moral disengagement is characterized by eight mechanisms belonging to one of the following four groups: (a) reconstructing conduct; (b) reconsideration of negative effects; (c) disqualification of the victim; and (d) obscuring of personal causal agency. Other researchers have measured moral disengagement in various contexts of everyday life using Bandura et al.'s scale and suggested that moral disengagement mechanisms would fall into two or three groups according to context. One context in which moral issues have a major role is sport. Methods: Three complementary studies were carried out on a total of 1305 young French adult athletes to develop and validate a Short French Questionnaire of Moral Disengagement in Sport (SFQMDS) and to test its invariance according to gender. STUDY 1: With reference to the existing literature, an initial French version of the SFQDMS was developed. French university students (n=220) then voluntarily completed the questionnaire. The validity of this preliminary version and the clarity of the items were examined and ascertained, and factorial analyses identified 10 items that loaded onto two factors (i.e., projecting fault onto others or sharing of responsibility; minimization of transgression and their consequences). Each factor displayed good internal consistency. STUDY 2: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS 7.0 software. The sample included 1021 French university students (M(age)=21.52; SD=2.34). The first analysis of the data from 298 French students suggested that four items should be eliminated. The six-item model was then tested with a CFA of the data from 723 other participants (M(age)=21.51; SD=2.34) and exhibited acceptable fit indices: (χ² [8, 723]=1.54; p>0.09; GFI=0.97; TLI=0.97; CFI=0.97; RMSEA=0.03; RMSEA LO/HI=0.01/0.05). These results confirmed the bifactorial structure of the instrument, as well as its partial invariance across genders at the most complex level (i.e., strict) of its factorial structure. These statistical analyses demonstrated the excellent internal consistency and very good construct validity of the SFQDMS. STUDY 3: The third study examined the temporal stability of the SFQDMS and its theoretical validity with a sample of 221 French students (M(age)=21.00; SD=2.05). Our results were found to be stable over time. From a theoretical standpoint, the SFQDMS was related to existing instruments that measure individuals' affective self-regulatory efficacy and prosocial behavior. These results demonstrated the external validity of the instrument. Conclusion: The overall results presented in these studies confirmed the good psychometric properties of the SFQDMS. This questionnaire consists of two subscales of three items measuring two groups of moral disengagement. The first involves projecting the fault for one's own transgressions onto others or sharing of responsibility (e.g., "It's not my fault if I behave badly [cheating or aggression] because it's my opponent who started it"). The second subscale involves the minimization of transgressions and their consequences (e.g., "It's not serious if I behave badly [cheating or aggression] because I do it to keep the advantage"). This instrument is a reliable tool that could be fruitfully used in future research addressing the moral disengagement of French adolescents or adults in sport. A deeper understanding of the processes involved in moral disengagement would facilitate the development of strategies to prevent or remediate transgressive behavior in the sport domain.

Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II)

Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS)

Validity and reliability of the Sport Motivation Scale-II for Chinese athletes

Psychometric validation of Czech version of the Sport Motivation Scale

Turkish Adaptation of the Sport Motivation Scale II (SMS-II): Procedures of Validity and Reliability

Validation of a German Version of the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS28) and Motivation Analysis in Competitive Mountain Runners

Development of a Greek Version of the Sport Motivation Scale

The Sport Motivation Scale for Children: Preliminary Analysis in Physical Education Classes

[Development and factorial validity of a moral disengagement in Sport Short Scale]

Preliminary validation of a brazilian version of the sport motivation scale

Two-Phase Evaluation of the Validity of a Measure for Self-Regulated Learning in Sport Practice

The Sport Experience Measure for Children and Youth (SEM:CY): A Rasch Validation Study

Validity, Reliability, and Invariance of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) across Diverse Physical Activity Contexts

Towards a Better Assessment of Perceived Social Influence: The Relative Role of Significant Others on Young Athletes.

Testing the validity and reliability of the doping willingness in sport scale

An extended validation of the Communal Coping Strategies Inventory for Competitive Team Sports: A multilevel approach

Motivational Climate Sport Youth Scale: Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Five Different Sports

Validation of the basic need satisfaction for sport scale in Ethiopian athletes

Reliability, Validity and Dimension of the Sport Consumer Consciousness Scale Based on the Analysis of SEM

[French validation of the modified version of the SAS]

Development and Initial Validation of the Sport Education Scale