Abstract:From the perspectives of grounded, situated, and embodied cognition, we have developed a new approach for assessing individual differences. Because this approach is grounded in two dimensions of situatedness—situational experience and the Situated Action Cycle—we refer to it as the Situated Assessment Method (SAM 2 ). Rather than abstracting over situations during assessment of a construct (as in traditional assessment instruments), SAM 2 assesses a construct in situations where it occurs, simultaneously measuring factors from the Situated Action Cycle known to influence it. To demonstrate this framework, we developed the SAM 2 Habitual Behavior Instrument (SAM 2 HBI). Across three studies with a total of 442 participants, the SAM 2 HBI produced a robust and replicable pattern of results at both the group and individual levels. Trait-level measures of habitual behavior exhibited large reliable individual differences in the regularity of performing positive versus negative habits. Situational assessments established large effects of situations and large situation by individual interactions. Several sources of evidence demonstrated construct and content validity for SAM 2 measures of habitual behavior. At both the group and individual levels, these measures were associated with factors from the Situated Action Cycle known to influence habitual behavior in the literature (consistency, automaticity, immediate reward, long-term reward). Regressions explained approximately 65% of the variance at the group level and a median of approximately 75% at the individual level. SAM 2 measures further exhibited well-established interactions with personality measures for self-control and neuroticism. Cognitive-affective processes from the Situated Action Cycle explained nearly all the variance in these interactions. Finally, a composite measure of habitualness established habitual behaviors at both the group and individual levels. Additionally, a composite measure of reward was positively related to the composite measure of habitualness, increasing with self-control and decreasing with neuroticism.

Validity, Reliability, and Invariance of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) across Diverse Physical Activity Contexts

The situational motivation scale in the exercise context: Construct validity, factor structure, and correlational analysis

Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS)

Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II)

The Sport Experience Measure for Children and Youth (SEM:CY): A Rasch Validation Study

Self-Determination Theory and Exercise Behavior: An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Motivation Scale

The Sport Motivation Scale for Children: Preliminary Analysis in Physical Education Classes

Psychometric validation of Czech version of the Sport Motivation Scale

Assessing physical activity in people with mental illness: 23-country reliability and validity of the simple physical activity questionnaire (SIMPAQ)

The exercise motivation scale: Its multifaceted structure and construct validity

Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a miiltitrait-meltimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments

Validation and invariance testing of the English Short Physical activity enjoyment scale

The Situated Assessment Method (SAM2): Establishing individual differences in habitual behavior

Motivational Climate Sport Youth Scale: Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Five Different Sports

Development of a Greek Version of the Sport Motivation Scale

Construct validation of a state version of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale among young women

Internal Structure of Participation Motivation Questionnaire Completed by Undergraduates

Content and internal structural validity of the motivation for mathematics abbreviated instrument

Assessment of Validity of Children's Movement Skill Quotient (CMSQ) Based on the Physical Education Classroom Environment

Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale