Abstract:Background Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries. Sex differences have been described in AS pathophysiology and left ventricular (LV) remodelling, as well as clinical presentation and response to therapies (1). However, sex differences in LV function parameters, namely global longitudinal strain (GLS), have been scarcely explored so far. Purpose To investigate sex differences, taking into account GLS, in patients with severe AS referred to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods The study population was from a single centre, prospective registry of patients with severe native valve AS who were referred for SAVR between June 2020 to October 2022. Severe AS was defined by standard guideline criteria (2). All patients underwent an echocardiogram immediately before and at least 3 months after surgery. Results Table 1 recapitulates sex differences in our population (n=119, 43% women). No differences in age or cardiovascular (CV) risk factors were noted. Clinical presentation and AS etiology were also similar. At baseline, women had lower EuroSCORE (p=0.039), creatinine (p <0.001), and haemoglobin levels (p=0.001). The echocardiogram showed a higher mean aortic valve gradient in women (Gmean, 62 vs. 50 mmHg, p=0.002). Women also had higher relative wall thickness (RWT, 0.49 vs. 0.42, p=0.037), despite lower LV mass index (124.9 vs. 136.6 g/m2, p=0.037). Regarding LV function, women showed higher EF (64% vs. 60%, p=0.002) and GLS (16.5% vs. 14.6%, p=0.006) values. This is partially explained by the higher prevalence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) in men, more frequently subjected to a concomitant coronary artery bypass graft than women (CABG, 38% vs. 8%, p <0.001). Post-operative complications had similar rates in men and women. After a median follow-up of 16 (6-18) months, death from any cause (6.0% vs. 1.5%, p=0.186) and rehospitalization for CV causes (14.0% vs. 4.0%, p=0.055) tended to be more frequent among women. When considering patients with severe AS alone (n=89), women had higher Gmean (64 vs. 53 mmHg, p=0.035) and EF (65% vs. 62%, p=0.045) but similar GLS (16.9% vs. 16.6%, p=0.230) as compared to men (Figure 2). At follow-up, EF and GLS failed to improve in both sexes and no differences were noted between women and men (EF 60% vs. 60%, p=0.476; GLS 15.9% vs. 16.0%, p=0.976). Conclusions In a population of all-comers patients with severe AS undergoing SAVR, women showed higher Gmean, EF, and GLS values. This is partially due to the higher prevalence of a concomitant CAD in men. When considering patients with AS alone, women still had higher EF and Gmean than men, despite a similar GLS. Future larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed in order to further characterize such differences and correlate them with specific outcomes.

Sex differences in population versus in-hospital use of aortic valve replacement procedures in Spain

Patterns of aortic valve replacement in Europe and adoption by sex

Sex difference and outcome trends following surgical aortic valve replacement from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database

Impact of gender on in-hospital and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis of the Spanish TAVI registry

Impact of female sex in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Long-term outcomes

Sex disparities in outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation- a multi-year propensity-matched nationwide study

Sex differences in the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with newer generation devices: A meta‐analysis

Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asia

Sex-specific aspects on prognosis after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a SWEDEHEART registry study

Impact of gender, ethnicity and social deprivation on access to surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a retrospective database study in England

Clinical impact of sex differences and procedural setting in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

An Analysis by Aetiology and Sex

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Aortic Annuli: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Gender-Based Outcomes

Sex differences in severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical replacement

Trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States, 2008-2018

Sex-differences in Newly Diagnosed Severe Aortic Stenosis in British Columbia (B.C.) between 2012 - 2022

Regional variation and temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in Switzerland: A population-based small area analysis

Retrospective cohort analysis of Spanish national trends of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention from 1998 to 2017

Sex differences and long-term clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A SWEDEHEART study

Sex Difference in Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis

Geographical Inequality in Access to Aortic Valve Intervention in England: A Report from the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry and National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit