Abstract:BACKGROUND: Thermodilution cardiac output using a pulmonary artery catheter is the reference method against which all new methods of cardiac output measurement are judged. However, thermodilution lacks precision and has a quoted precision error of ± 20%. There is uncertainty about its true precision and this causes difficulty when validating new cardiac output technology. Our aim in this investigation was to determine the current precision error of thermodilution measurements.METHODS: A test rig through which water circulated at different constant rates with ports to insert catheters into a flow chamber was assembled. Flow rate was measured by an externally placed transonic flowprobe and meter. The meter was calibrated by timed filling of a cylinder. Arrow and Edwards 7Fr thermodilution catheters, connected to a Siemens SC9000 cardiac output monitor, were tested. Thermodilution readings were made by injecting 5 mL of ice-cold water. Precision error was divided into random and systematic components, which were determined separately. Between-readings (random) variability was determined for each catheter by taking sets of 10 readings at different flow rates. Coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for each set and averaged. Between-catheter systems (systematic) variability was derived by plotting calibration lines for sets of catheters. Slopes were used to estimate the systematic component. Performances of 3 cardiac output monitors were compared: Siemens SC9000, Siemens Sirecust 1261, and Philips MP50.RESULTS: Five Arrow and 5 Edwards catheters were tested using the Siemens SC9000 monitor. Flow rates between 0.7 and 7.0 L/min were studied. The CV (random error) for Arrow was 5.4% and for Edwards was 4.8%. The random precision error was ± 10.0% (95% confidence limits). CV (systematic error) was 5.8% and 6.0%, respectively. The systematic precision error was ± 11.6%. The total precision error of a single thermodilution reading was ± 15.3% and ± 13.0% for triplicate readings. Precision error increased by 45% when using the Sirecust monitor and 100% when using the Philips monitor.CONCLUSION: In vitro testing of pulmonary artery catheters enabled us to measure both the random and systematic error components of thermodilution cardiac output measurement, and thus calculate the precision error. Using the Siemens monitor, we established a precision error of ± 15.3% for single and ± 13.0% for triplicate reading, which was similar to the previous estimate of ± 20%. However, this precision error was significantly worsened by using the Sirecust and Philips monitors. Clinicians should recognize that the precision error of thermodilution cardiac output is dependent on the selection of catheter and monitor model.

Thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction measurements: room temperature versus cold temperature injectate

The Effects of Differential Injection Sites of Cold Saline on Transpulmonary Thermodilution Parameter Values

Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits

Clinical estimation of left and right ventricular volume with open chest compared with transesophageal echocardiography and fast-response thermodilution

Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography

Accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement during liver transplantation

Impact of Misplaced Subclavian Vein Catheter into Jugular Vein on Transpulmonary Thermodilution Measurement Variables

Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Temperature Measurement in Adult Intensive Care Patients

Temperature measurement in critically ill adults: a comparison of tympanic and oral methods

Interchangeability of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic right heart measurements in the perioperative setting and correlation with hemodynamic parameters

Determination of the Precision Error of the Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Catheter Using an In Vitro Continuous Flow Test Rig

Minimal coronary microvascular resistance: agreement between continuous and bolus thermodilution

Simplification of continuous intracoronary thermodilution

Comparison of methods of temperature measurement in swine

Transpulmonary cardiac output with room temperature saline is accurate and tracks directional changes in anesthetized dogs

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring (NICOM) in the Critically Ill Patient Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study

Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference

Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use

Interchangeability of right ventricular longitudinal shortening fraction assessed by transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting: A prospective study

Benefits of an early cooling phase in continuous renal replacement therapy for ICU patients

Echocardiographic estimation of mean pulmonary artery pressure in critically ill patients