Abstract:Intracoronary stenting has been shown to have better immediate and long-term clinical outcomes and less restenosis than standard balloon angioplasty. However, the benefit was achieved at the cost of higher rates of coronary thrombosis, bleeding complications, the need for anticoagulation, and longer hospital stay. For the latter reasons there is a tendency to replace the anticoagulants by antiplatelet agents alone after stenting. However, we prospectively monitored 150 consecutive patients (133 men, 17 women, mean age 58.5 years) from two centers since February 1993. They all had coronary artery disease and underwent percutaneous implantation of non-heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz coronary stents under a full but lower dose of anticoagulation. The femoral approach was used in all patients except one. In the 150 patients, 200 stents were implanted in 165 target arteries with 172 lesions. Stenting was performed without the guidance of intravascular ultrasonography; high-pressure poststenting inflation was used in only 17.3% of patients with less than optimal angiographic results. Coronary angiography was performed at baseline, immediately after the procedure, and after 6 months (mean 207 ± 53.6 days SD) of stenting. The mean (±SD) coronary minimum luminal diameter increased from 0.52 0.31 mm to 3.13 ± 0.42 mm immediately after stenting was performed and was 2.12 ± 0.91 mm at 6 months. There was a 0% subacute thrombosis rate and a 0% femoral bleeding complication rate in the whole series. Only three (2%) major events occurred: one Q-wave myocardial infarction from closure of an angioplasty site distal to the stent on a very long lesion, one cerebrovascular accident, and one noncoronary-related death. The only patient who underwent the brachial approach had hematoma; otherwise no other minor event occurred. The mean hospital stay was 4.5 days in one of the two study centers. The long-term clinical follow-up rate was 97.3%. The mean (±SD) clinical follow-up period was 589 ± 363 days. Clinical symptoms improved; the percentage of patients who had angina according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional class II, III, and IV was 31.3%, 44.7%, and 4%, respectively, before stenting was performed and was reduced to 4.7%, 3.7%, and 0%, respectively at 6-month follow-up after stenting was performed. The 6-month angiographic restudy rate was 90.6%, and the restenosis rate was 18.3%. In contrast to other reported series, these results support the idea that with careful puncture technique and meticulous postoperative wound care, intracoronary stenting can be successfully performed with the patient under full anticoagulation without major risks of bleeding and femoral vascular complications. Furthermore with a full but comparatively lower dose of anticoagulation, subacute thrombotic complications can be reduced to 0% even with non-heparin-coated stents without the use of intravascular ultrasound guidance and without the use of adjunctive high-pressure poststenting inflation in most patients. The restenosis rate and long-term clinical outcomes remained very favorable.

Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation

Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation

[Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with 6F-guiding catheter by transradial approach].

Distal Radial Artery Access is a Safe and Feasible Technique in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Visceral Intervention

Transradial coronary angioplasty and stenting--immediate results and 3-month clinical follow-up in the first 50 patients performed at the National Heart Institute

Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with Tow-stent Techniques by Transradial Approach

Direct coronary stenting by transradial approach: rationale and technical issues

Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention in 92 Cases

Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Radial Approach for Patients with ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: It is Definitely the Best Access Site.

Transradial interventions in contemporary vascular surgery practice

Complications of Radial vs Femoral Access For Coronary Angiography and Intervention: What Do The Data Tell Us?

The efficacy and safety of transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction

A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study

Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting

Radial access for peripheral vascular intervention: the S.M.A.R.T. RADIANZ Vascular Stent System

No Subacute Thrombosis and Femoral Bleeding Complications under Full Anticoagulation in 150 Consecutive Patients Receiving Non-Heparin-coated Intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz Stents

Transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the next standard of care?

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Coronary Intervention through the Brachial Artery Compared to the Radial Artery in Elderly Patients with Different Extubation Times

PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION WITH A SMALL LUMINAL GUIDING CATHETER VIA RADIAL ARTERY FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC TOTAL CORONARY OCCLUSION

Sheathless versus standard guiding catheters for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis