Abstract:Okba Selmi, 1, 2 Ibrahim Ouergui, 1 Danielle E Levitt, 3, 4 Pantelis T Nikolaidis, 5 Beat Knechtle, 6 Anissa Bouassida 1 1 Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia; 2 High Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Ksar Said, University of Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia; 3 Applied Physiology Laboratory, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA; 4 Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA; 5 Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Nikaia, Greece; 6 Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Correspondence: Beat Knechtle Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, Vadianstrasse 26, St. Gallen 9001, Switzerland Tel +41 71 226 93 00 Fax +41 71 226 93 01 Email Introduction: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and small-sided games (SSG) have been applied and tested for athletes in order to enhance the soccer performance. For this reason, this experimental study aimed to compare the effects of SSGs and HIIT on power, physiological responses and perceived enjoyment. Materials and Methods: Sixteen youth soccer players (age, 17.5± 0.6 years, mean±standard deviation; height, 178.2± 6.4 cm; body mass, 70.4± 5.4 kg; body fat, 10.6± 0.8%) completed one session each of HIIT and SSG on separate days with 1 week between sessions. Each session lasted 25 mins (4x4 mins work with 3 mins of passive recovery in-between). SSGs consisted of 4 versus 4 player games on a 25× 35 m pitch, and HIIT consisted of intermittent 15-s runs at 110% maximal aerobic speed separated by 15 s of passive recovery. Psychological responses following each protocol were assessed using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). Heart rate (HR) was continuously recorded, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and lactate concentration [La] were measured after each training session. Lower body muscular power was assessed using the 5-jump test relative to leg length (5JT-relative) before and after each training session, where greater average distance per stride over five sequential jumping strides indicated greater muscular power. Results: HIIT and SSG showed no significant difference in HR, RPE and [La] responses (p=0.70, ES=0.11; p=0.61, ES=0.08 and p=0.38, ES=0.21, respectively). 5JT-relative decreased significantly for SSG and HIIT (p< 0.05, ES=0.50 and p< 0.05, ES=0.40, respectively). PACES score was greater in SSG compared to HIIT (ES=5.35, p< 0.001). Conclusion: HIIT and SSG sessions induced similar physiological responses; however, SSGs induced a higher enjoyment level than HIIT. Coaches could choose between these training modalities according to the objective of their training session, considering the enjoyment-related advantages of SSGs. Keywords: aerobic fitness, psychology, motivation, soccer, athletes It is well known that soccer competition stresses aerobic and anaerobic metabolism while demanding high-intensity activity. 1 Several training methods have been included in soccer training regimens to improve aerobic fitness, including high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and small-sided games (SSGs). 2,3 HIIT is an exercise modality alternating short bouts of high-intensity effort with recovery periods. 4 SSGs are soccer games played on smaller fields with fewer players than the 11 versus 11 on the field in competition. 5 Although previous studies have shown that adding HIIT to soccer training regimens can improve cardiorespiratory fitness of players, 6 coaches and physical trainers use SSGs in order to simultaneously train physiological systems, technical movements, and tactical aspects required during soccer games. 7–10 Selmi et al 11 indicated both SSGs and short intermittent running training (110% of maximal aerobic speed) induced similar lactate concentration, mean heart rate and percentage of maximal heart rate. Moreover, Dellal et al 27 reported that 4 vs 4 SSGs and 10 vs 10 SSGs resulted in the same rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scores as HIIT (l10% of maximal aerobic speed with 15 s of work to 15 s of rest) in elite soccer players. These parameters are important because they provide objective assessments of exercise intensity. In SSGs, the pitch size, number of players, coach encouragement, bout duration, different game rules, recovery period and the presence of goalkeepers directly impacts the intensity of players' activity. 5,11 The mos -Abstract Truncated-

Comparison of internal and external loads during different small-sided games in young female soccer players

Small-Sided Games are More Enjoyable Than High-Intensity Interval Training of Similar Exercise Intensity in Soccer

Internal, external and repeated-sprint demands in small-sided games: A comparison between bouts and age groups in elite youth soccer players

Physiological responses of small-sided vs. regular games in youth volleyball players

Effects of a small-sided games training program in youth male soccer players: variations of the locomotor profile while interacting with baseline level and with the accumulated load

Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players

The Effects of Exercise Order on the Psychophysiological Responses, Physical and Technical Performances of Young Soccer Players: Combined Small-Sided Games and High-Intensity Interval Training

Small-Sided Games Are Not as Effective as Intermittent Running to Stimulate Aerobic Metabolism in Prepubertal Soccer Players

Short-term effects of on-field combined core strength and small-sided games training on physical performance in young soccer players

Comparison of the Physical, Physiological, and Psychological Responses of the High-Intensity Interval (HIIT) and Small-Sided Games (SSG) Training Programs in Young Elite Soccer Players

Effect of In-Season Generic and Soccer-Specific High-Intensity Interval Training in Young Soccer Players

Comparative Effects of Game Profile-Based Training and Small-Sided Games on Physical Performance of Elite Young Soccer Players

Do Different Playing Formats and Aerobic Capacity Influence Variances in Psychophysiological Demands and Technical Performance in Small-Sided Games? A Study among Under-17 Male Soccer Players

The effects of game types on intensity of small-sided games among pre-adolescent youth football players

Temporal changes in intensity and volume of external training loads during a 1 × 1 short-bout, small-sided games in elite youth soccer players

Influence of Different Small-Sided Game Formats on Physical and Physiological Demands and Physical Performance in Young Soccer Players

Comparison of the Physical Demands of Friendly Matches and Different Types On-Field Integrated Training Sessions in Professional Soccer Players

Influence of the Number of Players on the Load of Soccer Players During Transition Games

Effects of short bout small-sided game training on acid-based balance markers in youth male soccer players

Large-Sided Games and Sport-Specific Training: Parameters of High Intensity in Professional Soccer Players

Correlations of Aerobic Capacity with External and Internal Load of Young Football Players during Small-Sided Games