Small-Sided Games are More Enjoyable Than High-Intensity Interval Training of Similar Exercise Intensity in Soccer
Okba Selmi,Ibrahim Ouergui,Danielle E Levitt,Pantelis T Nikolaidis,Beat Knechtle,Anissa Bouassida,Danielle E. Levitt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S244512
2022-01-20
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Okba Selmi, 1, 2 Ibrahim Ouergui, 1 Danielle E Levitt, 3, 4 Pantelis T Nikolaidis, 5 Beat Knechtle, 6 Anissa Bouassida 1 1 Research Unit, Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia; 2 High Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Ksar Said, University of Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia; 3 Applied Physiology Laboratory, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA; 4 Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA; 5 Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Nikaia, Greece; 6 Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Correspondence: Beat Knechtle Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, Vadianstrasse 26, St. Gallen 9001, Switzerland Tel +41 71 226 93 00 Fax +41 71 226 93 01 Email Introduction: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and small-sided games (SSG) have been applied and tested for athletes in order to enhance the soccer performance. For this reason, this experimental study aimed to compare the effects of SSGs and HIIT on power, physiological responses and perceived enjoyment. Materials and Methods: Sixteen youth soccer players (age, 17.5± 0.6 years, mean±standard deviation; height, 178.2± 6.4 cm; body mass, 70.4± 5.4 kg; body fat, 10.6± 0.8%) completed one session each of HIIT and SSG on separate days with 1 week between sessions. Each session lasted 25 mins (4x4 mins work with 3 mins of passive recovery in-between). SSGs consisted of 4 versus 4 player games on a 25× 35 m pitch, and HIIT consisted of intermittent 15-s runs at 110% maximal aerobic speed separated by 15 s of passive recovery. Psychological responses following each protocol were assessed using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). Heart rate (HR) was continuously recorded, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and lactate concentration [La] were measured after each training session. Lower body muscular power was assessed using the 5-jump test relative to leg length (5JT-relative) before and after each training session, where greater average distance per stride over five sequential jumping strides indicated greater muscular power. Results: HIIT and SSG showed no significant difference in HR, RPE and [La] responses (p=0.70, ES=0.11; p=0.61, ES=0.08 and p=0.38, ES=0.21, respectively). 5JT-relative decreased significantly for SSG and HIIT (p< 0.05, ES=0.50 and p< 0.05, ES=0.40, respectively). PACES score was greater in SSG compared to HIIT (ES=5.35, p< 0.001). Conclusion: HIIT and SSG sessions induced similar physiological responses; however, SSGs induced a higher enjoyment level than HIIT. Coaches could choose between these training modalities according to the objective of their training session, considering the enjoyment-related advantages of SSGs. Keywords: aerobic fitness, psychology, motivation, soccer, athletes It is well known that soccer competition stresses aerobic and anaerobic metabolism while demanding high-intensity activity. 1 Several training methods have been included in soccer training regimens to improve aerobic fitness, including high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and small-sided games (SSGs). 2,3 HIIT is an exercise modality alternating short bouts of high-intensity effort with recovery periods. 4 SSGs are soccer games played on smaller fields with fewer players than the 11 versus 11 on the field in competition. 5 Although previous studies have shown that adding HIIT to soccer training regimens can improve cardiorespiratory fitness of players, 6 coaches and physical trainers use SSGs in order to simultaneously train physiological systems, technical movements, and tactical aspects required during soccer games. 7–10 Selmi et al 11 indicated both SSGs and short intermittent running training (110% of maximal aerobic speed) induced similar lactate concentration, mean heart rate and percentage of maximal heart rate. Moreover, Dellal et al 27 reported that 4 vs 4 SSGs and 10 vs 10 SSGs resulted in the same rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scores as HIIT (l10% of maximal aerobic speed with 15 s of work to 15 s of rest) in elite soccer players. These parameters are important because they provide objective assessments of exercise intensity. In SSGs, the pitch size, number of players, coach encouragement, bout duration, different game rules, recovery period and the presence of goalkeepers directly impacts the intensity of players' activity. 5,11 The mos -Abstract Truncated-