Abstract:Over the last twenty five years, the perspective of health care financing has dramatically changed in developing countries. In this context, it is worth reviewing the literature and the experiences in order to understand the major shifts on this topic. During the sixties, health care policies focused on fighting major epidemics. Programs were dedicated to reduce the threat to population health. Financing related to the mobilization of resources for these programs and most of them were not managed within national administrations. The success of these policies was not sustainable. After Alma Ata, primary health care became a priority but it took some years before the management of the health care district was introduced as a major topic. In the eighties, with the district policy and the Bamako Initiative, the economic approach became a major part of all health care policies. At that time, most of health care financing was related to cost recovery strategies. All the attention was then drawn on how it worked: Fee policies, distribution of revenues, efficient use of resources and so on. In the second half of the nineties, cost recovery was relegated to the back scene, health care financing policy then becoming a major front scene matter. Two major reasons may explain this change in perspective: HIV which causes a major burden on the whole health system, and fighting poverty in relation with debts reduction. In most developing countries, with high HIV prevalence, access to care is no longer possible within the framework of the ongoing heath care financing scheme. Health plays a major role in poverty reduction strategies but health care officials must take into account every aspect of public financing. New facts also have to be taken into account: Decentralization/autonomy policies, the growing role of third party payment and the rising number of qualified health care professionals. All these facts, along with a broader emphasis given to the market, introduce a need for a better management of resources through financing mechanisms. Some major reports from WHO and the World Bank are the landmarks of the evolution on how to approach health care financing: The 1993 World Bank report on investing in health, the 2000 WHO report on health in the world and the WHO report on macroeconomics and health. In this early millenium, there is a general agreement on some major aspects of health care financing such as: Lack of resources for financing health care; cost recovery as a part of any sustainable health care system; health as a public good needing some extended subsidies; protecting people from the burden of disease as a part of financing schemes; equity in relation with the public private mix at the center of many debates; financing as a key mechanism for the regulation of the whole health care system and not only as a resource mobilization; HIV in bringing up new problems clearly shows how all these matters are related. Health care financing is at the heart of ongoing questions on health care reforms. Although developing countries have low insurance coverage and weak modern medical care, they share the same questions as developed countries: How to promote technical and allocative efficiency? What place for incentives? What role for the public sector? How can market and contracting bring results? What progress through stewardship and better governance?

Authors' reply to comments: "Financing and provision of healthcare for two billion people in low-income nations: Is the cooperative healthcare model a solution?"

The Impact of Expanded Health System Reform on Governmental Contributions and Individual Copayments in the New Chinese Rural Cooperative Medical System

MARIA‐LUISA ESCOBAR, CHARLES C. GRIFFIN and R. PAUL SHAW. the Impact of Health Insurance in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries. (washington, DC. USA: the Brookings Institution Press, 2010, ISBN 978‐0‐8157‐0546‐8, P. 221).

A Response to the Commentary Entitled: "addressing the Shortage of Health Professionals in Rural China: Issues and Progress".

Chinese Rural-Urban Care Gap: the Authors Respond

[Evolution and new perspectives of health care financing in developing countries]

The Financing And Organization Of Health Services In Poor Rural China: A Case Study In Donglan County

On the Sustainable Development of the New-model Rural Cooperative Medical Care with Zhongxiang City of Hubei Province As Case in Point

China’s Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme: a Type of Health Insurance or a Type of Health Cooperative?

Authors' Reply to: Clarity on the Type of Review. Comment on "Value Cocreation in Health Care: Systematic Review

A systematic review of the health-financing mechanisms in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries and the People’s Republic of China: Lessons for the move towards universal health coverage

Reply to commentaries on Health Problems

Non-evidence-based policy: How effective is China's new cooperative medical scheme in reducing medical impoverishment?

Sustainability of specialized healthcare in upper-middle-income economies: Innovations despite constraints

Hodges' model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health - universal health coverage demands a universal framework

Fair equality of opportunity critically reexamined: the family and the sustainability of health care systems

The “expert Patient” Approach for Non-Communicable Disease Management in Low and Middle Income Settings: when the Reality Confronts the Rhetoric

Health care financing in China prior to health reform 2009

Correction To: China’s Health Assistance to Africa: Opportunism or Altruism?

Health Care System in Rural China: A Quantitative Approach Based on Heterogeneous Individuals

Challenges and Suggestions:New Cooperative Medical System in China