Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa

Long Cheng,Yan He,Yun Tian,Biyun Liu,Yongyuan Zhang,Qiaohong Zhou,Zhenbin Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.110
IF: 8.8
2017-06-01
Chemosphere
Abstract:N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine (P<sub>1</sub>NA) and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine (P<sub>2</sub>NA) are both widely used as antioxidant and plant secondary metabolites. In this study, growth, esterase, photosynthetic activity and cell membrane integrity were used as biomarkers to compare biotoxicity of P<sub>1</sub>NA and P<sub>2</sub>NA on Microcystis aeruginosa. According to the results, a dose-response relationship was observed only between P<sub>1</sub>NA concentrations and growth inhibition. The EC<sub>50</sub> (48 h) of P<sub>1</sub>NA calculated from growth inhibition was 16.62 μM, while that of P<sub>2</sub>NA was not detected. When the esterase and photosynthetic activity were applied to evaluate the biotoxicity, it was found that a concentration of 20 μM P<sub>1</sub>NA, P<sub>2</sub>NA caused reduction of esterase activity and Fv/Fm of M. aeruginosa to 22.2 and 3.3%, 97.5 and 92.1%, respectively, after 48 h exposure. The percentage of membrane-damaged cells was increased as P<sub>1</sub>NA exposure concentration increased, but that was not detected when exposure to P<sub>2</sub>NA. The difference substituted position in the molecular structure of P<sub>1</sub>NA and P<sub>2</sub>NA leads to different toxicological properties and only P<sub>1</sub>NA was found highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. The toxicity is due to that only P<sub>1</sub>NA can be biotransformed to 1,4-naphthoquinone, which could induce overproduction of intracellular ROS as well as result in oxidative damage and growth inhibition of test organism.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?