Physiological and biochemical effects of allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) on cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa.

Yu Hong,Hong-Ying Hu,Feng-Min Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.10.010

IF: 7.129

2008-01-01

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract:The physiological and biochemical effects of an allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) isolated from reed (Phragmites communis) on bloom-forming cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa, were investigated. EMA significantly inhibited the growth of M. aeruginosa in a concentration-dependent way. The metabolic indices (represented by esterase and total dehydrogenase activities), the cellular redox status (represented by the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS)), and the oxidative damage index (represented by the content of malondialdehyde (MDA), the product of membrane lipid peroxidation) were used to evaluate the physiological and biochemical changes in M. aeruginosa after EMA exposure. Esterase activity in M. aeruginosa did not change (P>0.05) after 2h of exposure to EMA, but increased greatly after 24 and 48h (P<0.05). EMA exposure (>0.5mgL−1) resulted in a remarkable loss of total dehydrogenase activity in M. aeruginosa after 4h (P<0.01), but an increase after 40h (P<0.05). EMA caused a great increase in ROS level of the algal cells. At high EMA concentration (4mgL−1), the ROS level was remarkably elevated to 1.91 times as much as that in the controls after 2h. Increases in the ROS level also occurred after 24 and 48h. The increase in lipid peroxidation of M. aeruginosa was dependent upon EMA concentration and the exposure time. After 40h of exposure, the MDA content at 4mgL−1 of EMA reached approximately 3.5 times (P<0.01) versus the controls. These results suggest that the cellular structure and metabolic activity of M. aeruginosa are influenced by EMA; the increased metabolic activity perhaps reflects the fact that the resistance of cellular response system to the stress from EMA is initiated during EMA exposure, and the oxidative damage induced by EMA via the oxidation of ROS may be an important factor responsible for the inhibition of EMA on the growth of M. aeruginosa.