Abstract:In multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM), one of the most important problems is to determine the weights of criteria and experts. This paper intends to present two Min-Max models to optimize the point estimates of the weights. Since each expert generally possesses a uniform viewpoint on the importance (weighted value) of each criterion when he/she needs to rank the alternatives, the objective function in the first model is to minimize the maximum variation between the actual score vector and the ideal one for all the alternatives such that the optimal weights of criteria are consistent in ranking all the alternatives for the same expert. The second model is designed to optimize the weights of experts such that the obtained overall evaluation for each alternative can collect the perspectives of the experts as many as possible. Thus, the objective function in the second model is to minimize the maximum variation between the actual vector of evaluations and the ideal one for all the experts, such that the optimal weights can reduce the difference among the experts in evaluating the same alternative. For the constructed Min-Max models, another focus in this paper is on the development of an efficient algorithm for the optimal weights. Some applications are employed to show the significance of the models and algorithm. From the numerical results, it is clear that the developed Min-Max models more effectively solve the MCGDM problems including the ones with incomplete score matrices, compared with the methods available in the literature. Specifically, by the proposed method, (1) the evaluation uniformity of each expert on the same criteria is guaranteed; (2) The overall evaluation for each alternative can collect the judgements of the experts as many as possible; (3) The highest discrimination degree of the alternatives is obtained.

Multi-criteria group consensus model with risk aversion and minimum adjustment

The robust multiple criteria group decision aiding model with risk aversion

A two-stage distributionally robust maximum expert consensus model with asymmetric costs and risk aversion

A Novel Consensus Reaching Method for the Preference-Approval Structure Based on Regret Theory and Its Application in Evaluating Pension Institutions

Robust minimum cost consensus modeling with consensus principle and tolerance level for group decision making

Multi-round Minimum Cost Consensus Model with Objectivity-Fairness Driven Feedback Mechanism

Minimum Adjustment Cost Consensus Model with Bounded Risk Preference Attitudes: A Perspective Based on Fractional Stochastic Dominance

Minimum cost consensus model with loss aversion based large-scale group decision making

Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem with risk preferences

The robust maximum expert consensus model considering satisfaction preference

Consensus Building for Uncertain Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Based on the Clustering Algorithm and Robust Discrete Optimization

Risky Multicriteria Group Decision Making Based on Cloud Prospect Theory and Regret Feedback

Consensus Reaching in Group Decision Making With Linear Uncertain Preferences and Asymmetric Costs

Consensus reaching with two-stage minimum adjustments in multi-attribute group decision making: A method based on preference-approval structure and prospect theory

Multi-dimensional Multi-Round Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Iterative Mechanisms Involving Reward and Punishment Measures

The Interactive Consensus Reaching Process with the Minimum and Uncertain Cost in Group Decision Making

A Confidence-based Consensus Model for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making: Exploring the Bounded Trust Propagation and Personalized Adjustment Willingness

Maximum Consensus Model with Individual Tolerance and Mixed DEA Prospect Cross-Efficiency for Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making

New Min-Max Approach To Optimal Choice Of The Weights In Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Problems

Consensus Adjustment for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Cross-Allocation

A Minimum Cost Consensus Model with Linguistic Information in an Asymmetric Costs Context to Prevent Manipulative Behavior for Emergency Decision Making