The normality assumption on between-study random effects was questionable in a considerable number of Cochrane meta-analyses

Ziyu Liu,Fahad M. Al Amer,Mengli Xiao,Chang Xu,Luis Furuya-Kanamori,Hwanhee Hong,Lianne Siegel,Lifeng Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02823-9
IF: 9.3
2023-03-31
BMC Medicine
Abstract:Studies included in a meta-analysis are often heterogeneous. The traditional random-effects models assume their true effects to follow a normal distribution, while it is unclear if this critical assumption is practical. Violations of this between-study normality assumption could lead to problematic meta-analytical conclusions. We aimed to empirically examine if this assumption is valid in published meta-analyses.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?