Abstract:Abstract Background In meta-analyses of a binary outcome, double zero events in some studies cause a critical methodology problem. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) has been proposed as a valid statistical tool for pooling such data. Three parameter estimation methods, including the Laplace approximation (LA), penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature (AGHQ) were frequently used in the GLMM. However, the performance of GLMM via these estimation methods is unclear in meta-analysis with zero events. Methods A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance. We fitted five random-effects GLMMs and estimated the results through the LA, PQL and AGHQ methods, respectively. Each scenario conducted 20,000 simulation iterations. The data from Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were collected to form the simulation settings. The estimation methods were compared in terms of the convergence rate, bias, mean square error, and coverage probability. Results Our results suggested that when the total events were insufficient in either of the arms, the GLMMs did not show good point estimation to pool studies of rare events. The AGHQ method did not show better properties than the LA estimation in terms of convergence rate, bias, coverage, and possibility to produce very large odds ratios. In addition, although the PQL had some advantages, it was not the preferred option due to its low convergence rate in some situations, and the suboptimal point and variance estimation compared to the LA. Conclusion The GLMM is an alternative for meta-analysis of rare events and is especially useful in the presence of zero-events studies, while at least 10 total events in both arms is recommended when employing GLMM for meta-analysis. The penalized quasi-likelihood and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature are not superior to the Laplace approximation for rare events and thus they are not recommended.

Copas-Heckman-type Sensitivity Analysis for Publication Bias in Rare-Event Meta-Analysis under the Framework of the Generalized Linear Mixed Model

Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of sparse data based on exact likelihood

A likelihood-based sensitivity analysis for addressing publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using exact likelihood

Testing for publication bias in meta-analysis under Copas selection model

Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta‐analyses

A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes

Random‐effects meta‐analysis of few studies involving rare events

Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies

A likelihood based sensitivity analysis for publication bias on summary ROC in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data

Sensitivity analysis for publication bias on the time-dependent summary ROC analysis in meta-analysis of prognosis studies

Comparing various Bayesian random‐effects models for pooling randomized controlled trials with rare events

Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: A tutorial and call for more routine use

A re-analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta-analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters

Nonparametric worst-case bounds for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic curve

Random-Effect Meta-Analysis with Robust Between-Study Variance

Robust Point and Variance Estimation for Meta‐analyses with Selective Reporting and Dependent Effect Sizes

A confidence interval robust to publication bias for random-effects meta-analysis of few studies

Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis

A regression-based method for detecting publication bias in multivariate meta-analysis

Comparison of Prior Distributions for the Heterogeneity Parameter in a Rare Events Meta‐Analysis of a Few Studies