Closing the gender negotiation gap: The power of entitlements ,

Elif E. Demiral,Macie Addley,Erin Taylor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2024.102786
IF: 3
2024-12-14
Journal of Economic Psychology
Abstract:Women are less likely to negotiate for their labor market outcomes than men and this finding is linked to the gender gaps in economic outcomes. Through a wage negotiation experiment, we investigate how entitlements influence gender differences in negotiation likelihood. We manipulate the formation of entitlements by employing different hiring methods. Our results reveal that when the hiring process is based on luck (random treatment), men are more prone to negotiate than women. In the condition where the hiring process lacks transparency (unknown treatment), the gender gap declines and remains muted. When the hiring process is transparently grounded on merit (entitlement treatment), women react by displaying higher negotiation likelihood, and the gender gap in negotiation not only declines but reverses in direction. These findings underscore the potential of transparent and merit-based recruitment practices in mitigating gender disparities within labor market outcomes.
economics,psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?