Abstract:Past research suggests that when organizations communicate the benefits of their work for human welfare—that is, use a social impact framing for work—job candidates are willing to accept lower wages because they expect the work to be personally meaningful. We argue that this explanation overlooks a less socially desirable mechanism by which social impact framing leads to lower compensation demands: the perception among job candidates that requesting higher pay will breach organizational expectations to value work for its intrinsic (rather than extrinsic) rewards, or constitute a motivational norm violation. We find evidence for our theory across five studies: a qualitative study (Study 1), a hiring experiment with undergraduate students (Study 2), an online labor market field experiment (Study 3), a vignette-based simulation (Study 4), and a stimulus sampling study using multiple occupations (Study 5). Exploratory analyses find that the negative effects are unique to monetary (versus nonmonetary) job rewards. Together, results uncover a novel mechanism by which emphasizing work for the greater good leads job candidates to accept lower wages—one that reflects candidates self-censoring on pay from concerns about violating organizational norms rather than solely from a willingness to trade higher pay for potentially meaningful work. Our research contributes to understandings of how social responsibility messaging impacts workers’ perceptions of organizations and negotiation behavior. It also holds implications for emerging scholarship on managers’ implicit theories of employee work motivation. Funding: I. Hussain thanks the Dean’s Research Excellence Grant at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas Austin for generous financial support. The research also benefitted from Tier 1 Academic Research Funds awarded to M. Pitesa [Grant C207/MSS19B011] and M. Schaerer [Grant C207/MSS22B011] by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, and the Research & Development Fund of INSEAD. Supplemental Material: The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1675 .

Experimental evidence on the role of outside obligations in wage negotiations

Pay Disparity In Multinational And Domestic Firms In China: The Role Of Pro-Disparity Norm

The Effects of Power,Social Motive,and Accountability on the Negotiation Cognition,Behavior,and Outcomes

Pay Suppression in Social Impact Contexts: How Framing Work Around the Greater Good Inhibits Job Candidate Compensation Demands

Closing the gender negotiation gap: The power of entitlements ,

The gender equity gap: A multistudy investigation of within-job inequality in equity-based awards.

Board Gender Diversity and Within-Firm Wage Inequity: Evidence from the Relaxation of China’s One-Child Policy

Outside Options in the Labour Market

Worker Beliefs About Outside Options

Does Information Disclosure Affect the Gender Gap in Bidding Behavior? Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment on a Large Online Labor Platform

Do workers like employer driven flexibility? Experimental evidence on work and pay uncertainty and willingness to work

No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior.

Accounting for the Gap: A Firm Study Manipulating Organizational Accountability and Transparency in Pay Decisions

On a Firm's Optimal Response to Pressure for Gender Pay Equity

Gender Differences in Wage Negotiations: An Ultimatum Game Experiment

Gender differences in wage expectations and negotiation

Wage Bargaining Power of Internal Migrant Workers: Evidence from Urban Labor Market in China

Effort transparency and fairness

Multinational Enforcement of Labor Law: Experimental Evidence on Strengthening Occupational Safety and Health Committees

Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment

Does pay disclosure in job offers remove gender differences in pay estimations? Evidence from an experiment with students and job seekers in the context of Austria