Abstract:Male researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, potential mechanisms to avoid this gender imbalance remain poorly explored in STEM, including ecology and evolution areas. In the last decades, changes in the peer-review process towards double-anonymized (DA) have increased among ecology and evolution (EcoEvo) journals. Using comprehensive data on articles from 18 selected EcoEvo journals with an impact factor >1, we tested the effect of the DA peer-review process in female-leading ( i.e ., first and senior authors) articles. We tested whether the representation of female-leading authors differs between double and single-anonymized (SA) peer-reviewed journals. Also, we tested if the adoption of the DA by previous SA journals has increased the representativeness of female-leading authors over time. We found that publications led by female authors did not differ between DA and SA journals. Moreover, female-leading articles did not increase after changes from SA to DA peer-review. Tackling female underrepresentation in science is a complex task requiring many interventions. Still, our results highlight that adopting the DA peer-review system alone could be insufficient in fostering gender equality in EcoEvo scientific publications. Ecologists and evolutionists understand how diversity is important to ecosystems’ resilience in facing environmental changes. The question remaining is: why is it so difficult to promote and keep this “diversity” in addition to equity and inclusion in the academic environment? We thus argue that all scientists, mentors, and research centers must be engaged in promoting solutions to gender bias by fostering diversity, inclusion, and affirmative measures.

ECR Spotlight – Amanda Bundgaard

ECR Spotlight – Gebrehaweria Reda

ECR Spotlight – Elizabeth Rogers

ECR Spotlight – Harriet Goodrich

ECR Spotlight – Kelton Verble and Ellen Keaveny

ECR Spotlight – Jai Tiarks

ECR Spotlight – Jordan Glass

ECR Spotlight – Akihiro Itahara

ECR Spotlight – Sulayman Lyons

Experiences of early career researchers: Influences on the design and reporting of animal experiments, and the practical and emotional support needed to enhance best practice methods

David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system

Breaking barriers? Ethnicity and socioeconomic background impact on early career progression in the fields of ecology and evolution

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Including Early Career Researchers in Scientific Publishing

Are reactive oxygen species always bad? Lessons from hypoxic ectotherms

Q&A with Jun Wei Pek and Amanda Yunn Ee Ng

An interview with Karen Sears

Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time?

Spotlights on Recent JACS Publications, Volume 146, Issue 3

First person – Emily D. McParland and T. Amber Butcher

Spotlights on Recent JACS Publications, Volume 146, Issue 6