Characterizing the Diffusion of Research Leadership Flows in Research Collaborations: the Effect of Reciprocity, Triadic Closure, Preferential Attachment, and Homophily
Chaocheng He,Fuzhen Liu,Ke Dong,Jiang Wu,Qingpeng Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4083033
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Research leadership is crucial in research collaborations. Studying the diffusion mechanism of research leadership flows is helpful to better understand research collaborations. The existing literature mainly focuses on the mechanisms of symmetrical and undirected collaboration relationships among all coauthors, ignoring the role of the asymmetrical and directed relationship of research leadership. In addition, the existing literature mainly concentrates on cognitive proximity as researchers’ attributes features, without a systematic framework. To extend the literature, we construct a research leadership network, composed of directed research leadership flows. In addition, we apply Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) to model the formation mechanism of the research leadership network, from the perspective of both the effects of network structure features of directed social networks (endogenous mechanisms) and the researchers’ multi-proximity attribute features (exogenous mechanisms). Furthermore, we make a fine-grained comparison between the formation mechanism of research leadership network and traditional research collaboration network. The results show that research leadership flows tend to be reciprocal and diffuse based on a local hierarchy, with positive transitive triple closure and negative cyclic triple closure. It’s out-degree instead of in-degree that has a significant preferential attachment effect. The homophily effect in terms of cognitive, institutional, and geographical proximities influence the tie generation significantly. Regarding the comparison of the formation mechanisms between the two networks, the triadic closure, the preferential attachment, and the main effect of research productivity all play a significant role in the formation of the two networks. However, the two networks are driven differently. From the perspective of the directed research leadership network, we offer a comprehensive and systematical insight into understanding the mechanisms of research collaborations.