Betweenness centrality and the interdisciplinarity of cognitive science

Loet Leydesdorff,R. L. Goldstone,Thomas Schank
IF: 2.617
2008-01-01
Cognitive Science
Abstract:In a previous communication, Goldstone & Leydesdorff (2006) discussed the import and export of the journal Cognitive Science in terms of aggregated journal-to-journal citations. The main conclusion of the analysis was that the journal functions as an important intermediary between different disciplinary groups of journals that would be less directly connected if Cognitive Science did not exist. This bridging function is indicated by the journal’s betweenness centrality in the citation impact environment of the journal, that is, the network of journals in which Cognitive Science is cited in a specific year. However, the analysis was based on the most recent (2004) data available at that time. Although we also compared the 2004 citation patterns with those of one previous year (1988), two snapshots cannot provide sufficient information to discern trends in the organization of cognitive science among intellectually neighboring fields.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?