Biomechanical analysis of the effect of aligner overtreatment on molar distalization with clear aligners: a finite-element study
Jialun Li,yi yang,Ziwei Tang,qi Fan,Omar M. Ghaleb,Xian He,Wenli Lai,hu Long
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4146638/v1
2024-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to analyze the biomechanical effects of aligner overtreatment on molar distalization with clear aligners. Methods: Various models comprising maxillary dentition, maxilla, periodontal ligaments, attachments, and aligners were meticulously crafted and integrated into finite-element software. Six distinct study models were devised for analysis. The first three models examined second molar distalization with clear aligner, with different configurations of attachments, i.e., no attachment, horizontal attachment or vertical attachment on the second molar. For the fourth and fifth models, class II elastic traction, either implemented via precision cut or button on canines, was applied. Lastly, aligner overtreatment with varying degrees of root distal tipping (0°, 2°, 4°, 6°, 8°, 10°, 12°) for the second molar was designed in the last study model. Results: Distalization of the second molar produced buccal tipping, distal tipping and intrusion of the second molar, and labial proclination and intrusion of the central incisor. These displacement tendencies were enhanced by adding attachments on the second molar, especially the vertical attachment. Class II elastic tractions enhanced molar distalization and diminish anchorage loss of the anterior anchorage teeth, with the precision-cut configuration being biomechanically superior to the button design. Aligner overtreatment produced bodily molar distalization and mitigated adverse biomechanical effects on anterior anchorage teeth. Conclusion: We suggest that class II elastic traction via the precision-cut configuration and the design of vertical attachment on the second molar be applied for molar distalization with clear aligner. Appropriate aligner overtreatment helps achieve bodily molar distalization and minimize adverse biomechanical effects on anterior anchorage teeth. Clinical Relevance: These findings provide valuable insights for orthodontists in optimizing molar distalization outcomes with clear aligners. Integration of overtreatment can enhance treatment efficacy and predictability, ultimately improving patient care and satisfaction.