The effects of aligner anchorage preparation on mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners: A finite element study
Yi Yang,Ruicong Yang,Lu Liu,Xiaoqi Zhang,Qingsong Jiang,Qi Fan,Haoxin Zhang,Hu Long,Wenli Lai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.12.013
IF: 2.711
2023-01-01
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Abstract:Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of different aligner anchorage preparations on mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners and to assess the effects of different modes of Class II elastics on mandibular first molars. Methods: Finite elementmodels were constructed on the basis of cone-beamcomputed tomography data froman orthodontic patient. Themodels comprisedmaxilla, mandible, maxillary andmandibular teeth without first premolars, periodontal ligaments, attachments and aligners. Tooth displacement tendencieswere calculated using different aligner anchorage preparations and Class II elastics on themodels fromthe samepatient. Three group setswere designed on the basis of the positions of aligner cutouts and buttons (mesiobuccal, distobuccal and lingual). Four groups were established in each of the 3 group sets. Four groups were created: (1) no elastic traction1no anchorage preparation, (2) anchorage preparation only, (3) elastic traction only, and (4) elastic traction1 anchorage preparation. Different aligner anchorage preparations (0 degrees, 1 degrees, 2 degrees, 3 degrees) were applied onmandibular second premolars andmolars. The Class II traction forcewas set to 100 g. Results: With clear aligners, mandibular first molars were subject to mesial tipping, lingual tipping and intrusion. In the condition of no elastic traction, aligner anchorage preparation resulted in distal tipping, buccal tipping, and extrusion effect on mandibular firstmolars. Aligner anchorage preparation was more effective in the distal and lingual cutout groups than in the mesial cutout group. In the condition of Class II elastic traction, the bodily movement ofmandibular first molars was achieved with a 3 degrees anchorage preparation for the mesial cutout group and a 1.7 degrees anchorage preparation for distal and lingual cutout groups. Absolute maximal anchorage was achieved with a 2 degrees anchorage preparation for distal and lingual cutout groups. Conclusions: Clear aligner therapy causedmesial tipping, lingual tipping and intrusion of mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure. Aligner anchorage preparation effectively preventedmesial and lingual tipping ofmandibularmolars. Distal and lingual cutoutmodes were more effective thanmesial cutout modes in aligner anchorage preparation. For each aligner stage (0.25 mm), 1.7 degrees aligner anchorage preparation and Class II elastics with distal or lingual cutouts led to the bodily movement of mandibular first molars, whereas 2 degrees anchorage preparation reached absolute maximal anchorage. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023;164:226-38)