Abstract:The apportionment problem constitutes a fundamental problem in democratic societies: How to distribute a fixed number of seats among a set of states in proportion to the states' populations? This--seemingly simple--task has led to a rich literature and has become well known in the context of the US House of Representatives. In this paper, we connect the design of monotone apportionment methods to classic problems from discrete geometry and combinatorial optimization and explore the extent to which randomization can enhance proportionality. We first focus on the well-studied family of stationary divisor methods, which satisfy the strong population monotonicity property, and show that this family produces only a slightly superlinear number of different outputs as a function of the number of states. While our upper and lower bounds leave a small gap, we show that--surprisingly--closing this gap would solve a long-standing open problem from discrete geometry, known as the complexity of $k$-levels in line arrangements. The main downside of divisor methods is their violation of the quota axiom, i.e., every state should receive $\lfloor q_i\rfloor$ or $\lceil q_i\rceil$ seats, where $q_i$ is the proportional share of the state. As we show that randomizing over divisor methods can only partially overcome this issue, we propose a relaxed version of divisor methods in which the total number of seats may slightly deviate from the house size. By randomizing over them, we can simultaneously satisfy population monotonicity, quota, and ex-ante proportionality. Finally, we turn our attention to quota-compliant methods that are house-monotone, i.e., no state may lose a seat when the house size is increased. We provide a polyhedral characterization based on network flows, which implies a simple description of all ex-ante proportional randomized methods that are house-monotone and quota-compliant.

Rosters and connected apportionments

Affirmative Action in India: Restricted Strategy Space, Complex Constraints, and Direct Mechanism Design

Can Economic Theory Be Informative for the Judiciary? Affirmative Action in India via Vertical and Horizontal Reservations

Designing Direct Matching Mechanism for India with Comprehensive Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All

Joint Seat Allocation 2018: An algorithmic perspective

Congressional Apportionment: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach

Redistribution Mechanisms for Assignment of Heterogeneous Objects

In This Apportionment Lottery, the House Always Wins

The Over-and-Above Implementation of Reserve Policy in India

Fair Allocation of Indivisible Public Goods

On seat allocation problem with multiple merit lists

Repeated Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items

New Combinatorial Insights for Monotone Apportionment

Downstream Effects of Affirmative Action

Egalitarian Resource Sharing Over Multiple Rounds

A New Approach to Fair Distribution of Welfare

Proportional Consistency of Apportionment Methods

Apportionment with Weighted Seats

On allocations that give intersecting groups their fair share

Affirmative action in large population tullock contests