Abstract:The k-secretary problem deals with online selection of at most k numerically scored applicants, where selection decisions are immediate upon their arrival and irrevocable, with the goal of maximizing total score. There is, however, wide prevalence of bias in evaluations of applicants from different demographic groups (e.g., gender, age, race), and the assumption of an algorithm observing their true score is unreasonable in practice. In this work, we propose the poset secretary problem, where selection decisions must be made by observing a partial order over the applicants. This partial order is constructed to account for uncertainty and biases in applicant scores. We assume that each applicant has a fixed score, which is not visible to the algorithm and is consistent with the partial order. Using a random partitioning technique from the matroid secretary literature, we provide order-optimal competitive algorithms for the poset secretary problem and provide matching lower bounds. Further, we develop the theory of thresholding in posets to provide a tight, adaptive-thresholding algorithm under regimes where k grows quickly enough, thus matching the adaptiveness to k shown for the classical k-secretary problem. We then study a special case, in which applicants belong to g disjoint demographic groups and the bias is group specific. We provide competitive algorithms for adversarial and stochastic variants of this special case, including a framework, Gap, for parallelizing any vanilla k-secretary algorithm to the group setting. Finally, we perform a case study on real-world data to demonstrate the responsiveness of our algorithms to data and their impact on selection rates. This paper was accepted by Hamid Nazerzadeh, data science. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grant 2112533]. S. Gupta’s research was supported in part by NSF CAREER Award 2239824. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4926 .

On seat allocation problem with multiple merit lists

Joint Seat Allocation 2018: An algorithmic perspective

Affirmative Action in India: Restricted Strategy Space, Complex Constraints, and Direct Mechanism Design

Allocating with Priorities and Quotas: Algorithms, Complexity, and Dynamics

Rosters and connected apportionments

Improved Submodular Secretary Problem with Shortlists

Fair Rank Aggregation

Multivariate Analysis of Scheduling Fair Competitions

Merit-Based Sortition in Decentralized Systems

A 2-Competitive Largest Job on Least Loaded Machine Online Algorithm based on Multi Lists Scheduling Model

An Algorithmic Approach to Address Course Enrollment Challenges

Secretary Problems with Biased Evaluations Using Partial Ordinal Information

A new method for group decision making and its application in medical trainee selection

Approximation Algorithms for School Assignment: Group Fairness and Multi-criteria Optimization

Long-Term Fairness in Sequential Multi-Agent Selection with Positive Reinforcement

Assigning Course Schedules: About Preference Elicitation, Fairness, and Truthfulness

Counterbalancing Learning and Strategic Incentives in Allocation Markets

Balancing Notions of Equity: Trade-offs Between Fair Portfolio Sizes and Achievable Guarantees

Long-Term Resource Allocation Fairness in Average Markov Decision Process (AMDP) Environment

Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Unrestricted Feedback Delays

Algorithm Design for an Online Berth Allocation Problem