Causal overstatements in modern physical activity research

Eivind Schjelderup Skarpsno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-108031
IF: 18.4793
2024-06-22
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:The challenge of causation in physical activity research Although advancements such as access to large datasets with device-measured physical behaviour, and advances in statistics, have improved our understanding of the associations between physical activity (PA) and health outcomes, PA research often contains causal overstatements. The line between correlational and causal PA research is narrow, and confounding and reverse causation may lead to false conclusions. We contend that data must be able to answer a causal question before implications for '24-hour' PA guidelines and interventions are considered. Ideally, all comparative-effectiveness-research questions around PA would be answered via a sufficiently powered, perfectly randomised experiment with relevant outcomes, long follow-up and perfect adherence to the delivered PA intervention. However, even if randomisation provides a balance of risk factors between groups at the start of the study, the study groups may become progressively imbalanced through differential attrition during the follow-up. It is...
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?