Outcomes of Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) and Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP) Lung Transplantation
Selena S. Li,Masaki Funamoto,Ruby Singh,Seyed A. Rabi,Antonia Kreso,Eriberto Michel,Nathaniel B. Langer,Asishana A. Osho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.10.001
IF: 13.569
2024-10-11
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Abstract:Background Donation after circulatory death (DCD) and ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) have been adopted to expand the donor pool in lung transplantation, but outcomes data have been conflicting. This study explores mid-term outcomes of DCD lung transplantation in the modern era, with a focus on EVLP and risk factors for graft failure. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult lung transplants from 1/1/2015 to 3/1/2023. Loss to follow-up, multiorgan and prior lung transplants were excluded. DCD vs DBD (donation after brain death) lung transplants were compared, with subgroup analysis +/- EVLP. Outcomes were survival and postoperative complications. Overall survival was analyzed separately for an early era (2015-2018) and modern era (2019-2023). Results The study included 1103 DCD (221 with EVLP, and 882 without) and 17973 donation after brain death (DBD) lung transplants (524 with EVLP, and 17449 without). Median follow-up was 3 years. DCD donors were less likely to be CDC high risk (19.3% vs 24.1%, p<0.001), have purulence on bronchoscopy (13.3% vs 18.3%, p<0.001) or infiltrates on chest x-ray (66.7% vs 67.8%, p=0.013). EVLP was more likely to be used for DCD transplants (20.0% vs 2.9%, p<0.001).After transplant, DCD recipients were more likely to be reintubated (24.3% vs 18.5%, p<0.001) and require ECMO within 72 hours (14.9% vs 7.8%, p<0.001), and DCD donation was an independent risk factor for these complications on multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival did not differ significantly between DCD and DBD transplants on adjusted survival analysis in the early or modern era (p=0.774 and p=0.468 respectively). On multivariable Cox regression, DCD and EVLP were not independent risk factors for mortality.On subgroup analysis, the DCD+EVLP cohort had significantly worse survival in the modern era, which remained significant after adjusting for donor and recipient factors (p=0.005). EVLP was an independent risk factor for graft failure in the DCD cohort (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00-1.77, p=0.047), but did not significantly affect DBD graft survival (p=0.870). Risk factors for graft failure and mortality in the DCD+EVLP cohort included pulmonary hypertension (HR 77.5, 95% CI 6.15-979, p<0.001), transfusion prior to transplant (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.07-6.31, p=0.035), elevated creatinine (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.34-5.90, p=0.006), and higher allocation score (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p=0.017) Conclusion Study findings suggest increased risks of mortality and perioperative complications following transplantation with DCD lungs that have undergone EVLP. DCD lung transplantation without EVLP confers equivalent survival but with some increase in perioperative complications. Further investigation and careful recipient selection is warranted to optimize the use of these extended criteria donors in the modern era.
surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system,transplantation