Preliminary efficacy comparison of lung transplantation between V-A and V-V bypass types of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

李小杉,陈静瑜,于慧智,卫栋,胡春晓
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421203-20200608-00177
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognoses of recipients of lung transplantation(LTx)under venous-arterial(V-A)versus veno-venous(V-V)bypass of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO).Methods:A total of 220 patients undergoing LTx supported by ECMO were recruited. Based upon the types of ECMO, they were divided into two groups of V-A(147 cases)and V-V(73 cases). Perioperative data of donor/recipient, including postoperative complications and short-term survival rates, were retrospectively analyzed.Results:The proportions of female donors, operative duration, volume of blood transfusion and urine production were higher in V-A group than those in V-V group( P<0.05). And ECMO bypass time was lower in V-A group than that in V-V group( P<0.001). The postoperative complications of thoracotomy, pulmonary infection, primary graft dysfunction, renal dysfunction, volume of blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation time and short-term survival rate differed insignificantly between two groups( P>0.05). The extension of ECMO bypass time was correlated with postoperative mechanical ventilation time and short-term survival rate. Compared to patients with a ECMO bypass time < 12 h, the risk of mechanical ventilation ≥3 days was 7.48(95%CI: 2.61~21.49), 12.30(95%CI: 4.54~33.33)and 16.02(95%CI: 5.25~48.84)folds. And the risk of early postoperative death was 2.21(95%CI: 1.00~4.86), 2.73(95%CI: 1.34~5.56)and 6.63(95%CI: 3.23~13.59)folds greater for patients with a bypass time of 12.0~23.9, 24.0~47.9 and ≥48 h respectively. Conclusions:Under the current regimen of ECMO application, bypass type of ECMO does not affect the postoperative complications and short-term survival rates. Yet ECMO bypass time has a predictive value for short-term survival time of recipients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?