The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Detection and Management: A Systematic Review Meta-analysis
Elan Zebrowitz,Sonali Dadoo,Paige Brabant,Anaz Uddin,Esewi Aifuwa,Danielle Maraia,Mill Etienne,Neriy Yakubov,Myoungmee Babu,Benson Babu,Mill Ettienne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.03.24303653
2024-08-25
Intelligence-Based Medicine
Abstract:Introduction Stroke remains the second leading cause of death worldwide, with many survivors facing significant disabilities. In acute stroke care, the timeless adage 'Time is brain' underscores the vital need for quick action. Innovative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology potentially offers swift detection and management of acute ischemic strokes, leading acute stroke care towards enhanced automation. Methods The study is registered with Prospero under CRD42024496716 and adheres to the Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes framework (PICO). The analysis used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, PubMed, DBLP, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, Cochrane database, IEEE, Web of Science, ArXiv, MedRxiv Web of Science, and Semantic Scholar. The articles included were published between 2019 and 2023. Out of 1,528 articles identified, thirty-eight met the inclusion criteria. Results We compared AI-augmented Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) detection and non-AI in various patient processing times related to emergent endovascular therapy in acute ischemic strokes. Triage Time, Door-to-Intervention Notification Time (INR), and Door-to -Arterial Puncture Time revealed an odds ratio (OR) of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29 - 0.54, p < 0.001), 0.30 30 (95% CI: 0.21 - 0.42, p < 0.001), and 0.50 (95% CI: 0.30 - 0.82, p = 0.007), respectively. CT-to-Puncture-Time and Door-to-CTA-Time yielded an OR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.31 - 1.04, p = 0.065) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.37-1.60, p = 0.489), respectively. The Last Known Well (LWK) to Time of Arrival resulted in an OR of 1.15 (95% CI: 0.83 - 1.59, p = 0.409). AI stroke detection sensitivity OR of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88 - 0.95, p < 0.001), National Institute of Health score (NIHSS) 16.20 (95% CI: 14.96 - 17.45, p = 0.001). Patient Transfer-Times between primary and comprehensive stroke centers generated an OR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.73 - 1.32, p = 893). Similarly, Door-in-Door-Out Time (DIDO) had an OR of 1.19 (95% CI: 0.21 - 6.88, p = 0.848). The results indicated significant differences across several parameters between the AI and non-AI groups. Conclusion Our findings highlight how AI augments healthcare providers' ability to detect and manage strokes swiftly and accurately within acute care settings. As these technologies advance and AI becomes more integrated into healthcare systems, longitudinal studies are critical in evaluating its impact on workflow efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and clinical outcomes.
English Else