Abstract:Background and objectives: It has been proposed that people with delusions have difficulty inhibiting beliefs (i.e., "doxastic inhibition") so as to reason about them as if they might not be true. We used a continuity approach to test this proposal in non-clinical adults scoring high and low in psychometrically assessed delusion-proneness. High delusion-prone individuals were expected to show greater difficulty than low delusion-prone individuals on "conflict" items of a "belief-bias" reasoning task (i.e. when required to reason logically about statements that conflicted with reality), but not on "non-conflict" items. Methods: Twenty high delusion-prone and twenty low delusion-prone participants (according to the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory) completed a belief-bias reasoning task and tests of IQ, working memory and general inhibition (Excluded Letter Fluency, Stroop and Hayling Sentence Completion). Results: High delusion-prone individuals showed greater difficulty than low delusion-prone individuals on the Stroop and Excluded Letter Fluency tests of inhibition, but no greater difficulty on the conflict versus non-conflict items of the belief-bias task. They did, however, make significantly more errors overall on the belief-bias task, despite controlling for IQ, working memory and general inhibitory control. Limitations: The study had a relatively small sample size and used non-clinical participants to test a theory of cognitive processing in individuals with clinically diagnosed delusions. Conclusions: Results failed to support a role for doxastic inhibitory failure in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals. These individuals did, however, show difficulty with conditional reasoning about statements that may or may not conflict with reality, independent of any general cognitive or inhibitory deficits.

The effects of strength and activation level of belief on belief-biased reasoning

Linguistic Cues Facilitate Children’s Understanding of Belief-Reporting Sentences

Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals

Syllogistic reasoning and belief-bias inhibition in school children: evidence from a negative priming paradigm.

Thinking Style and Paranormal Belief: The Role of Cognitive Biases

Belief Bias Identification

Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning

Do smart people have better intuitions?

Deliberation, mood response, and the confirmation bias in the religious belief domain.

Teleological reasoning bias is predicted by pupil dynamics: Evidence for the extensive integration account of bias in reasoning

Cognitive Bias and Belief Revision

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Tracking politically motivated reasoning in the brain: the role of mentalizing, value-encoding, and error-detection networks

A biased activation theory of the cognitive and attentional modulation of emotion

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

Belief formation and the persistence of biased beliefs

A common factor underlying individual differences in confirmation bias

Everything is connected: Inference and attractors in delusions

A pragmatic account of the weak evidence effect

Relative Belief Inferences from Decision Theory