Abstract:Distinctive encoding usually increases correct recognition while also producing a reduction in false recognition. In the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion this phenomenon, called the mirror effect, occurs when participants focus on unique features of each of the words in the study list. In previous studies, the pleasantness rating task, used to foster distinctive encoding, generated different patterns of results. The main aim of our research is to examine under what circumstances this task can produce the mirror effect in the DRM paradigm, based on evidence from recognition accuracy and subjective retrieval experience. In Experiment 1, a standard version (word pleasantness rating on a 5-point Likert-type scale) was used for comparison with two other encoding conditions: shallow processing (vowel identification) and a read-only control. The standard task, compared to the other conditions, increased correct recognition, but did not reduce false recognition, and this result may be affected by the number of lists presented for study. Therefore, in experiment 2, to minimize the possible effect of the so-called retention size, the number of studied lists was reduced. In addition, the standard version was compared with a supposedly more item-specific version (participants rated the pleasantness of words while thinking of a single reason for this), also including the read-only control condition. In both versions of the pleasantness rating task, more correct recognition is achieved compared to the control condition, with no differences between the two versions. In the false recognition observed here, only the specific pleasantness rating task achieved a reduction relative to the control condition. On the other hand, the subjective retrieval experience accompanied correct and false recognition in the various study conditions. Although the standard pleasantness rating task has been considered to perform item-specific processing, our results challenge that claim. Furthermore, we propose a possible boundary condition of the standard task for the reduction of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

Creating false memories in children using French word lists.

The Effects of Detected Relationship Between List Items and Critical Lures on False Memories

“Identify-to-reject”: A specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm

From vector spaces to DRM lists: False Memory Generator, a software for automated generation of lists of stimuli inducing false memories

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

Comparison of semantic and phonological false memories in short- and long-term tests

Semantic and episodic processes differently predict false memories in the DRM task

"I heard it before ... or not": time-course of ERP response and behavioural correlates associated with false recognition memory

Short-Term Phantom Recollection in 8-10-Year-Olds and Young Adults

False (or biased) memory: Emotion and working memory capacity effects in the DRM paradigm

Persistence of false memories and emergence of collective false memory: collaborative recall of DRM word lists

Can Maltreated Children Inhibit True and False Memories for Emotional Information?

A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples

A registered report testing the effect of sleep on Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory: greater lure and veridical recall but fewer intrusions after sleep

Examining the effects of pleasantness ratings on correct and false recognition in the DRM paradigm: accuracy, recollection and familiarity estimates

The Effect of Test Context on False Memory

Disrupters As Well As Monitors: Roles of Others During and after Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure

A Study on the Factors Influencing False Memory

Emotional false memories: the impact of response bias under speeded retrieval conditions

Neurophysiological Correlates of Memory Illusion in Both Encoding and Retrieval Phases

Reduced false memory in the second language of Turkish-English bilinguals