Institutional Shareholding and Corporate Fraud:Evidence from China
Lu Yao,Zhu Yujie,Hu Xiaoyuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.01.003
2012-01-01
Abstract:Accusations of corporate wrongdoing have dominated headlines over the last decade and have generated a great deal of research inquiry.This paper identifies an important factor in assessing a firm’s likelihood of engaging in wrongdoing.To address the issue of the partial observations of corporate fraud,we estimate the Bivariate Probit model with the data of the 1729 Chinese listed firms over the period of 2001-2009.We find that institutional shareholding ownership is positively and significantly related to fraud detection,and is negatively and significantly related to fraud propensity after controlling for firm characteristics,other corporate governance factors,industry factors and economics environmental factors.These findings are robust after addressing the endogenous problem on institutional shareholding by employing the instrumental variable regression method.In addition,the impacts of the institutional shareholding on corporate fraud detection and propensity vary in terms of the types of corporate frauds and the types of institutional shareholding.Specifically,the investigation reveals that the impact of institutional shareholding on fraud propensity related to information disclosure is stronger than that related to operating issues.Also,the proportion of fraud firms is higher in securities investment funds holding firms than in insurance companies holding firms,social security funds holding firms,and enterprises annuities holding firms.Besides,we also examine the interactive effects of institutional shareholding with other widely documented internal corporate governance mechanisms including state ownership,ownership concentration,board size and percentage of independent directors of the board,respectively.The results suggest that the monitoring benefits from institutional investors are independent from these other firm’s internal governance mechanisms including state ownership,ownership concentration,board size and percentage of independent directors of the board.Overall,the above results imply that institutional investors help to prevent and reveal corporate fraud in China.This study provides important implications for institutional investors,firms and government in acting against corporate fraud in Chinese financial market.