Abstract:This working paper is hosted by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) and may not be commercially reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. Summary. Randomized clinical trials are a powerful tool for investigating causal treatment effects, but in human trials there are oftentimes problems of noncompliance which standard analyses, such as the intention-to-treat or as-treated analysis, either ignore or incorporate in such a way that the resulting estimand is no longer a causal effect. One alternative to these analyses is the complier average causal effect (CACE) which estimates the average causal treatment effect among a subpopulation that would comply under any treatment assigned. We focus on the setting of a randomized clinical trial with crossover treatment noncompliance (e.g., control subjects could receive the intervention and intervention subjects could receive the control) and outcome nonresponse. In this article, we develop estimators for the CACE using multiple imputation methods, which have been successfully applied to a wide variety of missing data problems, but have not yet been applied to the potential outcomes setting of causal inference. Using simulated data we investigate the finite sample properties of these estimators as well as of competing procedures in a simple setting. Finally we illustrate our methods using a real randomized encouragement design study on the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. 1. Introduction The focus of empirical studies in medicine is often to estimate the causal effect of treatments, where randomized clinical trials are considered the most acceptable tool for investigating these causal relationships. But in trials involving human subjects there are oftentimes problems of patient noncompliance, where the patient does not adhere to the treatment assigned. In addition, there is also the problem of nonignorable missing data, where the missing-data mechanism may depend on unobserved data. Standard methods and analyses either ignore these complications, which can lead to biased estimates of causal treatment effect, or account for them in such a way that the resulting estimand can no longer be considered a causal effect of treatment. A statistical framework for causal inference that deals with the issue of noncompliance is based on potential outcomes and was first introduced by Neyman (1923) for randomized studies and later developed by Rubin (1974, 1978) for nonrandomized studies and other forms of inference. Rubin's approach, sometimes referred to as the Ru-bin Causal Model (Holland, 1986), provides a framework for defining the parameters of interest and correctly attributing the …

Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes

Series 2-19-2009 Multiple Imputation Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Nonresponse in Randomized Clinical Trials

Assumptions when Analyzing Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes

Direct Estimation of the Mean Outcome on Treatment when Treatment Assignment and Discontinuation Compete

Intent-to-treat Analysis of Cluster Randomized Trials when Clusters Report Unidentifiable Outcome Proportions.

Identification of complier and noncomplier average causal effects in the presence of latent missing-at-random (LMAR) outcomes: a unifying view and choices of assumptions

Semiparametric Inference of the Complier Average Causal Effect with Nonignorable Missing Outcomes

Intention-to-treat Analysis Controls the Bias when Suffer from Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trial Study

Conflating marginal and conditional treatment effects: Comments on 'Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study'

Markov-Restricted Analysis of Randomized Trials with Non-Monotone Missing Binary Outcomes

Generalizing treatment effects with incomplete covariates: Identifying assumptions and multiple imputation algorithms

Causal survival analysis: A guide to estimating intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects from randomized clinical trials with non-adherence

On inference of control-based imputation for analysis of repeated binary outcomes with missing data

Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies

Evaluating causal effects on time-to-event outcomes in an RCT in Oncology with treatment discontinuation due to adverse events

Understanding the Intention-to-treat Principle in Randomized Controlled Trials

More Powerful Multiple Testing in Randomized Experiments with Non-Compliance

Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects

Identifiability and Estimation of Causal Effects in Randomized Trials with Noncompliance and Completely Nonignorable Missing Data

A Bayesian Classification Trees Approach to Treatment Effect Variation with Noncompliance