Abstract:This working paper is hosted by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) and may not be commercially reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. Summary. Randomized clinical trials are a powerful tool for investigating causal treatment effects, but in human trials there are oftentimes problems of noncompliance which standard analyses, such as the intention-to-treat or as-treated analysis, either ignore or incorporate in such a way that the resulting estimand is no longer a causal effect. One alternative to these analyses is the complier average causal effect (CACE) which estimates the average causal treatment effect among a subpopulation that would comply under any treatment assigned. We focus on the setting of a randomized clinical trial with crossover treatment noncompliance (e.g., control subjects could receive the intervention and intervention subjects could receive the control) and outcome nonresponse. In this article, we develop estimators for the CACE using multiple imputation methods, which have been successfully applied to a wide variety of missing data problems, but have not yet been applied to the potential outcomes setting of causal inference. Using simulated data we investigate the finite sample properties of these estimators as well as of competing procedures in a simple setting. Finally we illustrate our methods using a real randomized encouragement design study on the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. 1. Introduction The focus of empirical studies in medicine is often to estimate the causal effect of treatments, where randomized clinical trials are considered the most acceptable tool for investigating these causal relationships. But in trials involving human subjects there are oftentimes problems of patient noncompliance, where the patient does not adhere to the treatment assigned. In addition, there is also the problem of nonignorable missing data, where the missing-data mechanism may depend on unobserved data. Standard methods and analyses either ignore these complications, which can lead to biased estimates of causal treatment effect, or account for them in such a way that the resulting estimand can no longer be considered a causal effect of treatment. A statistical framework for causal inference that deals with the issue of noncompliance is based on potential outcomes and was first introduced by Neyman (1923) for randomized studies and later developed by Rubin (1974, 1978) for nonrandomized studies and other forms of inference. Rubin's approach, sometimes referred to as the Ru-bin Causal Model (Holland, 1986), provides a framework for defining the parameters of interest and correctly attributing the …

Assumptions when Analyzing Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance and Missing Outcomes

Assumptions when analyzing randomized experiments with noncompliance and missing outcomes

Series 2-19-2009 Multiple Imputation Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Nonresponse in Randomized Clinical Trials

Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects in Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance

A broader template for analyzing broken randomized experiments

Random eects logistic models for analyzing ecacy of a longitudinal randomized treatment with non-adherence

Non-compliance and missing data in health economic evaluation

More Powerful Randomization-Basedp-values in Double-Blind Trials with Non-Compliance

Identification of complier and noncomplier average causal effects in the presence of latent missing-at-random (LMAR) outcomes: a unifying view and choices of assumptions

Markov-Restricted Analysis of Randomized Trials with Non-Monotone Missing Binary Outcomes

Identifiability and Estimation of Causal Effects in Randomized Trials with Noncompliance and Completely Nonignorable Missing Data

Using a Satisficing Model of Experimenter Decision-Making to Guide Finite-Sample Inference for Compromised Experiments

What are the statistical implications of treatment non‐compliance in cluster randomized trials: A simulation study

More Powerful Multiple Testing in Randomized Experiments with Non-Compliance

Handling Missing Data in Randomized Controlled Trials with Omitted Moderation Effects

Bayesian Causal Inference in Sequentially Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance

Semiparametric Inference of the Complier Average Causal Effect with Nonignorable Missing Outcomes

Model-assisted complier average treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments with non-compliance and a binary outcome