Abstract:Using a set of oscillator strengths and excited-state dipole moments of near full configuration interaction quality determined for small compounds, we benchmark the performances of several single-reference wave function methods [CC2, CCSD, CC3, CCSDT, ADC(2), and ADC(3/2)] and time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT) with various functionals (B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97X-D). We consider the impact of various gauges (length, velocity, and mixed) and formalisms: equation of motion versus linear response, relaxed versus unrelaxed orbitals, and so forth. Beyond the expected accuracy improvements and a neat decrease of formalism sensitivity when using higher-order wave function methods, the present contribution shows that, for both ADC(2) and CC2, the choice of gauge impacts more significantly the magnitude of the oscillator strengths than the choice of formalism and that CCSD yields a notable improvement on this transition property as compared to CC2. For the excited-state dipole moments, switching on orbital relaxation appreciably improves the accuracy of both ADC(2) and CC2 but has a rather small effect at the CCSD level. Going from ground to excited states, the typical errors on dipole moments for a given method tend to roughly triple. Interestingly, the ADC(3/2) oscillator strengths and dipoles are significantly more accurate than their ADC(2) counterparts, whereas the two models do deliver rather similar absolute errors for transition energies. Concerning TD-DFT, one finds: (i) a rather negligible impact of the gauge on oscillator strengths for all tested functionals (except for M06-2X); (ii) deviations of <i>ca.</i> 0.10 D on ground-state dipoles for all functionals; (iii) strong differences between excited-state dipoles obtained with, on the one hand, B3LYP and PBE0 and, on the other hand, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97X-D, the latter group being markedly more accurate with the selected basis set; and (iv) the better overall performance of CAM-B3LYP for the two considered excited-state properties. Finally, for all investigated properties, both the accuracy and consistency obtained with the second-order wave function approaches, ADC(2) and CC2, do not clearly outperform those of TD-DFT, hinting that assessing the accuracy of the latter (or selecting a specific functional) on the basis of the results of the former is not systematically a well-settled strategy.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228</a>.Additional reference data for five compounds; raw values for transition energies; oscillator strengths; dipole moments; excited state dipoles; basis set effects for water; and Cartesian coordinates (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228/suppl_file/ct0c01228_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Two-Photon Absorption Strengths of Small Molecules: Reference CC3 Values and Benchmarks

Two-photon Absorption Strengths of Small- and Medium-Sized Molecules: Reference CC3 Values and Benchmarks

Reference CC3 Excitation Energies for Organic Chromophores: Benchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/$GW$ and Wave Function Methods

How To Arrive at Accurate Benchmark Values for Transition Metal Compounds: Computation or Experiment?

Toward Accurate Two-Photon Absorption Spectrum Simulations: Exploring the Landscape beyond the Generalized Gradient Approximation

Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments

Simulations of Vibronic Profiles in Two-Photon Absorption

Two-photon Absorption of Hydrogen-Bonded Octupolar Molecule Clusters.

Dynamics of Two-Photon Absorption by Molecules and Solutions

Post-CCSD(T) corrections to bond distances and vibrational frequencies: the power of $Λ$

Absorption Intensities of Organic Molecules from Electronic Structure Calculations versus Experiments: The Effect of Solvation, Method, Basis Set, and Transition Moment Gauge

Density Functional Response Theory Calculations of Three-Photon Absorption.

Beyond Explored Functionals: A Computational Journey of Two-Photon Absorption

Comment on: "Toward Accurate Two-Photon Absorption Spectrum Simulations: Exploring the Landscape beyond the Generalized Gradient Approximation"

Calculations of two-photon absorption cross sections by means of density-functional theory

Theoretical investigation on dendritic molecules with large two-photon absorption cross section

One- and Two-Photon Absorption Properties of Octupolar Molecules with Tetrahedral Structure

HAB79: A new molecular dataset for benchmarking DFT and DFTB electronic couplings against high-level ab initio calculations

Choosing an atomic basis set for TD-DFT, SOPPA, ADC(2), CIS(D), CC2 and EOM-CCSD calculations of low-lying excited states of organic dyes

Two-Photon Absorption and Excited State Dynamics of Two Organic Molecules Containing Donor/Acceptor Moieties

Scalable Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods with Near Chemical Accuracy for Main Group Chemistry