Abstract:This study investigated the underlying causes of the myopic outcomes of the optic-based newer formulas (Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, Kane, Hoffer-QST and PEARL-DGS) in long Korean eyes with Alcon TFNT intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Postoperative data from 3100 randomly selected eyes of 3100 patients were analyzed to compare the reference back-calculated effective lens positions (ELPs) based on the Haigis formula using conventional axial length (AL) and Cooke-modified AL (CMAL) with the predicted ELP of each single- and triple-optimized Haigis formula applied to AL- and CMAL. Contrary to the AL-applied Haigis formula, the predicted ELP curve of the CMAL-applied, single-optimized Haigis formula, simulating the methods of the newer formulas, exhibited a significant upward deviation from the back-calculated ELP in long eyes. The relationship between the AL and anterior chamber depth in our long-eyed population differed from that in the base population of the PEARL-DGS formula. The myopic outcomes in long eyes appeared to stem from the substantial overestimation of the postoperative IOL position with AL modification, leading to the implantation of inappropriately higher-powered IOLs. This discrepancy may be attributed to the ethnic differences in ocular biometrics, particularly the relatively smaller anterior segment in East Asian patients with long AL.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the myopic results that occur when using new intraocular lens (IOL) refractive power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long axial lengths. Specifically, the study aims to explore why, in Korean patients with long axial lengths, the use of new optical - based IOL refractive power calculation formulas (such as Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, Kane, Hoffer QST, and PEARL - DGS) leads to significant myopic shifts, while these shifts are not observed when using the single - optimized or triple - optimized Haigis formulas with traditional axial length (AL). ### Background and Problem - **Background**: The prevalence of myopia is on the rise globally, especially in the East Asian population. Since moderate - to - high myopia is related to cataracts, it is expected that an increasing number of myopic patients will require cataract surgery in the future. - **Problem**: Although the refractive results after cataract surgery have improved significantly, there is still an obvious hyperopic trend in patients with long axial lengths. Most optical biometers use the group refractive index when measuring the axial length, which may lead to underestimation and overestimation of the axial lengths of short and long eyes respectively. - **Research Objective**: To explore the potential reasons for the myopic shift caused by new IOL refractive power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long axial lengths. ### Main Findings - **Data Source**: Analyzed the postoperative data of 3,100 randomly selected patients (3,100 eyes) and compared the calculated effective lens position (ELP) and the predicted ELP based on the Haigis formula. - **Main Results**: - The new formulas show significant myopic shifts in patients with long axial lengths, while the traditional single - optimized or triple - optimized Haigis formulas do not have this phenomenon. - The single - optimized Haigis formula using Cooke - modified axial length (CMAL) shows a significant upward deviation in patients with long axial lengths, which may lead to overestimation of the postoperative IOL position and thus implantation of an overly high IOL refractive power. - The anterior segments of Korean patients with long axial lengths are smaller, especially the anterior chamber depth is shallower, which is different from the training population of the new formulas and may be one of the reasons for the myopic shift. ### Discussion - **Formula Accuracy**: The accuracy of the new formulas mainly depends on how closely they approach the actual postoperative required ELP. In patients with long axial lengths, the shortening of CMAL may reduce the ELP required to achieve emmetropia, thus leading to myopic shift. - **Population Differences**: The training populations of the new formulas may have different ocular biometric parameters, especially deeper anterior chamber depths, which may lead to myopic shifts in Korean patients with long axial lengths. - **Algorithm Adaptability**: The single - optimized Haigis formula cannot adapt well to non - linear relationships, while the triple - optimized Haigis formula better adapts to the ELP prediction in patients with long axial lengths by adjusting the a1 and a2 constants. ### Conclusion This study reveals the potential mechanisms by which new IOL refractive power calculation formulas cause myopic shifts in Korean patients with long axial lengths, mainly due to ethnic differences in ocular biometric parameters. This finding is of great significance for improving the refractive prediction accuracy of cataract surgery in East Asia.

Investigation of the myopic outcomes of the newer intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long eyes

Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with a history of acute primary angle-closure attack

Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm

Accuracy of new intraocular lens calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with short axial lengths

Assessment of the influence of keratometry on intraocular lens calculation formulas in long axial length eyes

Predictability of 6 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in People With Very High Myopia

Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods Following Myopic Laser Refractive Surgery: New Options Using a Rotating Scheimpflug Camera

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Long Eyes: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of Segmented Optical Axial Length on the Performance of New-Generation Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Extremely Long Eyes

Impact of segmented optical axial length on the performance of intraocular lens power calculation formulas

IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas

Influence of Ocular Biometry Parameters on the Predictive Accuracy of IOL Power Formulas in Patients with High Myopia.

Accuracy of recent intraocular lens power calculation methods in post-myopic LASIK eyes

Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber depth and normal axial length

Study of intraocular lens power after LASIK in myopic patients

Effect of the ratio of axial length to keratometry on SRK/T intraocular lens power calculations for eyes with long axial lengths

Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Formulas Calculated by Biometers with Multiple Refractive Indices According to Axial Length

How to choose the intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes with extremely long axial length? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in high myopia

Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas based on swept-source OCT biometer in cataract patients with phakic intraocular lens