Factors affecting quality of life after pelvic fracture

Vishal Verma,Ramesh Kumar Sen,Sujit Kumar Tripathy,Sameer Aggarwal,Suresh Sharma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.011
2020-11-01
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Introduction</h3><p>Functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after pelvis fracture is suboptimal; majority of the patients do not return to their preinjury activities. Many researchers reported that late morbidity in pelvis fracture is associated with severity of the fracture, associated trauma, pelvic fracture-related complications and methods of treatment.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Material and methods</h3><p>One hundred and twelve patients with pelvis fracture who were treated either conservatively (n = 88) or surgically (n = 24) with a minimum of two years follow up were evaluated clinically and radiologically. The clinical outcome was evaluated using Majeed score and self-reported Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Their health related quality of life (HRQOL) was evaluated using SF-36 and WHO BREF questionnaires. The fracture-displacement in the anterior or posterior pelvis ring was measured from the anteroposterior radiograph or inlet/outlet view.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The average Majeed score was 76.65 ± 14.73 (range, 36 to 96). There were 81 patients with good to excellent outcomes and 31 patients with poor to fair outcomes. The average SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score was 47.71 + 7.88 (range, 27.3 to 61.5) and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 49.20 + 9.37 (range, 23.1 to 56.8). The functional level of the general population in the physical and mental domain was achieved in 48.23% and 65.3% of pelvic-fractured patients respectively. General population norms were achieved in 56.3%, 63.4%, 65.2% and 84.8% of patients in WHO Bref QoL domain one, two, three and four respectively. The patients had significantly worse functional outcome and HRQOL if residual displacement was &gt; 1 cm. Age, sex, associated injuries and injury mechanism were not affecting the HRQOL in patients with acceptable residual displacement of ≤ 1 cm.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Pelvic fracture with the residual displacement of ≤ 1 cm in the sacroiliac joint/symphysis pubis result in better functional outcome and quality of life. Injury mechanism and associated injury have no impact on the health-related quality of life if the residual displacement is within the acceptable limit.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?