Abstract:Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive technology with trajectory screw fixation for fragility fractures of pelvic(FFP). Methods: A retrospective case control study was performed to analyze the clinical data of 35 patients with FFP who were treated and followed up between January 2016 and December 2019. There were 12 males and 23 females, aged from 65 to 99 years with an average of(75.4±7.8) years old. There were 13 cases of type Ⅱb, 7 cases of type Ⅱc, 8 cases of type Ⅲa, 2 cases of type Ⅲb, 2 cases of type Ⅲc, 1 case of type Ⅳb, and 2 cases of type Ⅳc according to Rommens FFP comprehensive classification. All patients received the treatment of minimally invasive technology with trajectory screws fixation. According to the different methods of anterior pelvic ring fixation, FFP patients were divided into two groups:12 cases were fixed with the pedicle screw rod system in the anterior pelvic subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) group;23 cases were fixed with hollow screws of the pubic symphysis, superior ramus of pubis or acetabular anterior column in the screw group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, length of hospital stay, cost of internal fixation, pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale(VAS) were compared between the two groups. The fracture reduction quality was evaluated according to the Matta criteria, and the clinical function was evaluated by the Majeed functional scoring system respectively. Results: All patients were followed up for 12 to 39(16.5±5.4) months after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, and length of hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05). As for the cost of internal fixation, the cost of internal fixation in the screw group [2 914 (2 914, 4 371) yuan] was significantly lower than that of the INFIX group [6 205 (6 205, 6 205) yuan] (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS assessment at admission, 1 week, and 3 months after surgery between the two groups(P>0.05). However, the VAS assessment at 1 week and 3 months after surgery of the two groups were significantly better than those at admission(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction after the operation and the efficacy evaluation at the last follow-up between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of fragility fractures, minimally invasive technology with trajectory screw fixation can achieve good clinical efficacy. It has the advantages of being relatively minimally invasive, less bleeding, relieving the pain. It deserves clinical application.

Short-term mobility in low-energy pelvic ring fractures after conservative treatment

Fragility fractures of the pelvis: First 48 cases of surgical treatment at a level 1 trauma center in France

Operative versus conservative treatment in pelvic ring fractures with sacral involvement

Feasibility of Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation Alone for Treating Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Fractures with Nondisplaced Complete Sacral Fractures: a Retrospective Study

Post Post-Mobilization Films for LC1 Pelvic Ring Injuries: Follow up Stress Imaging Demonstrates Minimal Utility

Surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: short-term outcomes of 42 patients

Assessment of Lateral Compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries by intraoperative manipulation: which fracture pattern is unstable?

Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Outcomes of Patients With Pelvic-Ring Fractures Managed by Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Conservative treatment of fragility fracture of the pelvis: A retrospective study

Lateral Compression Type 2 Pelvic Fractures-A Clinical Study of Fracture Displacement Measurement and Closed Reduction.

Low-impact pelvic fractures in the emergency department

Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis

Early Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Propensity-Matched Multicenter Study

Minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate osteosynthesis shows excellent results in elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis

Fracture of the pelvic ring: a retrospective review of 224 patients treated at a single institution

The lateral stress radiograph: an effective alternative to examination under anesthesia for identifying occult instability in minimally displaced lateral compression pelvic ring injuries

Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures in the Geriatric Fracture Center

Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury

[Effect analysis of trajectory screw technique in fragility fracture of pelvic ring]

Long-Term Follow-Up after Iliosacral Screw Fixation of Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures