Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to examine the dimensions of the fraud triangle to explain academic cheating behavior during online learning. Theoretical Framework: The theory that examines the causes of fraud is the fraud triangle theory. This theory was first put forward by Edwin Sutherland, who coined the term white-color crime, and Donald Cressey, who was a student of Sutherland's in a doctoral program in the 1940s and author of Other People Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses multiple regression analysis with the number of samples of this study are 73 accounting students at the Indonesian Christian University in Maluku who have passed auditing courses and business and professional ethics. Data were collected using a survey method. Findings: The results of this study indicate that partial pressure and opportunity affect academic cheating, while rationalization does not affect academic cheating. This study also shows that simultaneously academic fraud is determined by the dimensions of the fraud triangle, namely pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. Research, Practical & Social Implications: The implication of this research is to provide useful input to institutions, especially the UKIM Faculty of Economics and Business, to make online learning standards. Also, the teaching staff as input in the teaching and learning process pays attention that pressure, opportunity, and rationalization are important to determine student behavior in academic fraud. Originality/Value: The results of this research indicate that rationalization does not influence academic fraud behaviors. Rationalization is self-justification or the wrong reasons for wrong behavior. This is due to the awareness of the perpetrators of academic fraud that the fraud committed is an act that is not commendable, so guilt arises when committing academic fraud. It does not support the fraud triangle theory which states that rationalization encourages fraud.

An examination of online cheating among business students through the lens of the Dark Triad and Fraud Diamond

The role of self-efficacy and the fraud diamond on the decision to use assignment assistance websites

Investigating academic dishonesty among business school students using fraud triangle theory and role of technology

The Hexaco-60, the Dark Triad and Scholastic Cheating

Triangle's Fraud Theory on Academic Fraud Behavior When online Learning

Student Identification of Academic Cheating Typology and the Link to Shoplifting Motivation

The Effects of Peer Influence, Honor Codes, and Personality Traits on Cheating Behavior in a University Setting

The Effects of the Dark Triad on Unethical Behavior

Pilfering Grades: An Exploratory Study into Classroom Cheating Using Shoplifting Theory

Cheating in Online Courses for Financial Aid Fraud in the U.S.

Relationships within the Fraud Diamond: The Decision Processes That Influence Fraudulent Intentions in Online Consumer Fraud

Cheating is in the Eye of the Beholder: an Evolving Understanding of Academic Misconduct

Students' Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Academic Misconduct: An Inquiry into the Multivariate Nature of a Complex Phenomenon

HEXACO, the Dark Triad, and Chat GPT: Who is willing to commit academic cheating?

The Dark Triad, Performance Avoidance, and Academic Cheating

Academic Dishonesty and the Diamond Fraud: Attitudes of UAE Undergraduate Business Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Entitlement mediates the relationship between dark triad traits and academic misconduct

Combating Academic Fraud: Are Students Reticent about Uncovering the Covert?

Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look

The ethical dissonance in digital and non-digital learning environments: Does technology promotes cheating among middle school students?

Factors affecting accounting students’ misuse of chatgpt: an application of the fraud triangle theory