The role of self-efficacy and the fraud diamond on the decision to use assignment assistance websites

Kenneth J. Smith,David J. Emerson,Megan S. Kelly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06965-8
IF: 2.8
2024-11-28
Current Psychology
Abstract:Recently, several factors have exacerbated the potential for college students to circumvent the learning process. These include rapid technological advances, easy information access, pressure to succeed, and the widespread availability of websites that provide "assistance" in completing outside assignments. With data collected from a sample of 964 students pursuing a variety of academic degrees at a U.S. public university in the Mid-Atlantic region, we conducted Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analyses to assess the impact of individual-level personality factors on student inclinations to use assignment assistance websites (AAW). Specifically, we examined how self-efficacy interacted with the constituent components of the fraud diamond to influence students' decisions to use AAW. We observed that self-efficacy exerted a substantial influence on multiple fraud diamond elements, and that both the fraud diamond and self-efficacy play an influential role in not only students' intentions to use AAW but also their actual use. However, the effects of self-efficacy were fundamentally different between groups identified as cheaters or non-cheaters. For example, although we found that self-efficacy exerted a negative influence on students' motivation to cheat for the full sample and that this effect was stronger for the non-cheaters, we also found that this effect was positive and non-significant for those who reported frequent/very frequent cheating. Conversely, while the effects of self-efficacy on perceived capability were positive for the full sample and three times larger for the cheaters, it was not significant for non-cheaters. These results lead us to believe that there is one or more unmeasured confounding variables that are influential in the cheating decision.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?