Abstract:Tracking the surface and sub‐surface fibre orientations before and after moulding, and linking them to mechanical performance. An image‐based fiber orientation analysis technique has been employed to study the effect of initial charge coverage and preferential fiber alignment on the flow‐induced fiber orientations in carbon fiber sheet molding compounds (SMCs). The initial charge coverage area exhibited minimal fiber reorientation while significant fiber alignment in the flow direction was observed in the regions of greatest flow. Novel subsurface analysis using the same full‐field orientation analysis technique also showed the presence of a skin‐core structure with greater flow‐induced fiber alignment at the mold surfaces, while the core retained more of the initial fiber orientation distribution. Edge effects were also revealed by this analysis at the mold walls. Tensile testing from two orthogonal directions showed that panels molded from lower charge coverage resulted in better mechanical performance and lower anisotropy. Moreover, by encouraging charge flow in the preform's preferential alignment direction, high tensile stiffness and strength in the preferred direction were achieved (56.7 GPa and 238.9 MPa, respectively) at 30% fiber volume fraction. This provides a practical demonstration of the value in controlling fiber orientation, with respect to charge positioning and mold flow, to maximize and tailor the composite performance of SMCs typically used for automotive applications. Highlights Low‐cost scanning technique is extended to assess internal fiber orientations Full‐field orientations are measured before and after molding Investigation of how charge size and shape can affect orientations Combining effects of flow and initial orientation to tailor SMC performance Circular statistics provides a thorough analysis of orientation distributions

On the influence of flow-front orientation on stringer stiffened composite panels in water impacts

Green Water Loading on a Floating Structure with Degree of Freedom Effects

Three-dimensional numerical modeling of composite panels subjected to underwater blast

Influence of Immersion in Water under Hydraulic Pressure on the Interfacial Shear Strength of a Unidirectional Carbon/glass Hybrid Rod

Investigation of Silica-Based Shear Thickening Fluid in Enhancing Composite Impact Resistance

Experimental and numerical response and failure of laterally impacted carbon/glass fibre-reinforced hybrid composite laminates

Environmental implications of a sandwich structure of a glass fiber-reinforced polymer ship

Numerical modeling and experimental validation of low velocity impact of woven GFRP/CFRP composites

A new engineering theory describing oblique free surface impact by flexible plates

Comparative experimental study on mechanical properties of CFRP subjected to seawater and hydrostatic pressure

Study on the Mechanical Properties of a Carbon-Fiber/Glass-Fiber Hybrid Foam Sandwich Structure

Full‐field effect of flow‐induced fiber orientation during compression molding of carbon fiber sheet molding compounds

Experimental study on the dynamic response of a 3-D wedge under asymmetric impact

Curved grid‐scored foam core sandwich composites under low‐velocity impact loads: Effects of curvature, stacking sequence, and core finishing

Experimental Investigation of the Fluid-Structure Interaction during the Water Impact of Thin Aluminium Plates at High Horizontal Speed

The influence of asymmetric faces on low-velocity impact failure of CFRP/aluminum foam composite sandwich beams

Progressive failure simulation of angled composite beams subject to flexural loading

Effect of Impactor velocity and boundary condition on low velocity impact finite element modelling of CFRP composite laminates

Cavity flow characteristics of a curved hull section impacting a free surface with inclined postures

Effect of resin-rich areas on failure behavior of unidirectional CFRP under transverse pure shear

Experimental and Numerical Prediction of Slamming Impact Loads Considering Fluid–Structure Interactions