Abstract:Background: The advantages of virtual surgical planning (VSP) for orthognathic surgery are clear. Previous studies have evaluated in-house VSP; however, few fully digital, in-house protocols for orthognathic surgery have been studied. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between the virtual surgical plan and actual surgical outcome for orthognathic surgery using a fully digital, in-house VSP workflow. Study design, setting, sample: This is a prospective cohort study from September 2020 to November 2022 of patients at the Victoria General Hospital in Halifax, NS, Canada who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Patients were excluded if they had previously undergone orthognathic surgery or were diagnosed with a craniofacial syndrome. Main outcome variables: The primary outcome variables were the mean 3-dimensional (3D) (Euclidean) distance error, as well as mean error and mean absolute error in the transverse (x axis), vertical (y axis), and anterior-posterior (z axis) dimensions. Covariates: Covariates included age, sex, and surgical sequence (mandible-first or maxilla-first). Analyses: The primary outcome was tested using Z and t critical value confidence intervals. The P value was set at .05. The 3D distance error for mandible-first and maxilla-first groups was compared using a 2-sample t-test as well as analysis of variance. Results: The study sample included 52 subjects (24 males and 28 females) with a mean age of 27.7 (± 12.1) years. Forty three subjects underwent mandible-first surgery and 9 maxilla-first surgery. The mean absolute distance error was largest in the anterior-posterior dimension for all landmarks (except posterior nasal spine, left condyle, and gonion) and exceeded the threshold for clinical acceptability (2 mm) in 16 of 23 landmarks. Additionally, mean distance error in the anterior-posterior dimension was negative for all landmarks, indicating deficient movement in that direction. The effect of surgical sequence on 3D distance error was not statistically significant (P = .37). Conclusion and relevance: In general, the largest contributor to mean 3D distance error was deficient movement in the anterior-posterior direction. Otherwise, mean absolute distance error in the vertical and transverse dimensions was clinically acceptable (< 2 mm). These findings were felt to be valuable for treatment planning purposes when using a fully digital, in-house VSP workflow.

Forced Esthetic Position: A Diagnostic Strategy for Anteroposterior Repositioning in Orthognathic Surgeries

Correction of Jaw Deformities in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients by Orthognathic Surgery

Reverse Engineering Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontics in Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Case Report

Ortho-surgical treatment in Class II skeletal patients with mandibular retrognathism: a concise systematic review

Digital Planning to Enhance Diagnosis and Precision in Correcting Excessive Gingival Display in the Presence of Asymmetrical Maxillary Position: A Case Report

Zygomatic Rotation-Advancement: A New Concept for the Correction of Exorbitism in Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Maxillary molar intrusion and transverse decompensation to enable mandibular single-jaw surgery with rotational setback and transverse shift for a patient with mandibular prognathism and asymmetry

A Retrospective Study on the Role of the Upper Incisor Position and a Morphological Evaluation of the Anterior Nasal Spine

Alternative treatment to orthognatic surgery by the application of digital smile planning

Alteration of Occlusal Plane in Orthognathic Surgery: Clinical Features to Help Treatment Planning on Class III Patients

Surgical-orthodontic Treatment of Class III Patients with Long Face Problems: a Retrospective Study.

Surgery‐first in interdisciplinary class II cases

[Orthognathic surgery: a significant tool for reassessment]

Effect of Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement and Clockwise Rotation on the Anteromedial Cheek Soft Tissue Change in Patients with Skeletal Class III Pattern and Midface Deficiency: A 3D Imaging-Based Prediction Study

Active vertical control with skeletal anchorage for optimizing facial profile in a severe Class II high-angle protrusion case

Evaluation of a Fully Digital, In-House Virtual Surgical Planning Workflow for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

Combination approach for treatment of mandibular prognathism: Bilateral saggital split osteotomy with pre & post surgical orthodontics

Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of a Skeletal Mandibular Prognathism Patient with Severe Deep Overbite.

Computer aided planning for orthognatic surgery

Predicting optimal patient-specific postoperative facial landmarks for patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities

Transforming Adolescent Smiles: Correcting Skeletal Mandibular Retrusion and Bimaxillary Protrusion with Clear Aligners