Abstract:Introduction: Correction of a severe anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy, as described in this case of extreme skeletal class III malocclusion, can be quite challenging and fraught with difficulties. Conventional, single-stage bi-jaw orthognathic surgery with pre-and post-surgical orthodontics is associated with drawbacks such as the risk of relapse and an unsatisfactory overall long-term outcome, with persisting occlusal discrepancies and skeletal abnormalities, especially when the magnitude of skeletal correction required is large. Excessive mandibular setback can restrict tongue space, cause narrowing of posterior airway and pharyngeal space, and be prone to relapse from the forward pterygomasseteric muscle pull, while large maxillary advancements are often accompanied by wound dehiscence and bone exposure at the site of pterygomaxillary disjunction, delayed union or malunion at the osteotomy and disjunction sites, and risk of relapse due to backward palatopharyngeal muscle pull. In addition, bi-jaw surgeries invariably involve an appreciable blood loss and a prolonged operating time with its attendant anaesthetic risks such as respiratory insufficiency. Aim and objectives: To develop an orthosurgical protocol wherein excessive skeletal discrepancy can be successfully managed, achieving the desired magnitude of correction, with little or no relapse. To assess its efficacy and superiority over the hitherto-employed single-stage bi-jaw procedures in the management of severe skeletal discrepancies. Materials and method: A two-staged, shorter 'single-jaw at a time' operative procedure with an intervening period of three months between the two surgical phases was employed. Results: Drawbacks of conventional orthognathic surgery may be obviated by employing a two-staged protocol of bi-jaw surgeries allowing a minimum time period of 3 months to elapse between them. This period of time intervening between the maxillary advancement and mandibular setback allows the oral and maxillofacial musculature to adapt itself to the new jaw position following the first surgery, thus creating a better and more stable environment for the succeeding one, thereby reducing the chances of relapse thereafter, and producing more effective and stable long-term results. Moreover, the intervening time period also allows for observation of the repositioned jaw and arch relations achieved, and scrutiny for any positional changes in this post-surgical phase, which thereby allows modifications in the planned surgery of the next jaw, so as to achieve the most ideal final outcome following the second jaw surgery. A shorter operating time, reduced operator fatigue and less blood loss are other obvious advantages over the conventional bi-jaw procedures. Conclusion: An effective and stable correction of the extreme class III skeletal deformity and malocclusion was achieved, with a dramatic enhancement of facial balance, symmetry and proportion in this patient, following a modified orthosurgical management protocol. The staged protocol of 'maxilla first and mandible after' orthognathic surgery with conventional pre- and post-surgical orthodontics helped in pushing the envelope of skeletal discrepancy correctable by orthognathic surgery, thereby achieving large quantum of jaw movements, with ideal and stable functional as well as aesthetic results. This is suggestive of its efficacy and superiority over the hitherto-employed single stage bi-jaw procedures in the management of severe skeletal discrepancies.

Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of a Skeletal Mandibular Prognathism Patient with Severe Deep Overbite.

The Stability Guided Multidisciplinary Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Involving Impacted Canines and Thin Periodontal Biotype: A Case Report with Eight-Year Follow-Up.

Nonsurgical treatment for an adult with open bite, narrow upper arch, and several impacted premolars

Improvement of asymmetric stomatognathic functions, unilateral crossbite, and facial esthetics in a patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion and mandibular asymmetry, treated with orthognathic surgery

Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Mandibular Protrusion with Multiple Impacted Ankylosed Teeth Treated with Alveolar Corticotomy

Nonextraction and nonsurgical treatment of an adult with skeletal Class II open bite with severe retrognathic mandible and temporomandibular disorders

[Combined Surgical-Orthodontic Correction for Mandibular Protrusion].

Orthodontic-surgical treatment of an Angle Class II malocclusion patient with mandibular hypoplasia and missing maxillary first molars: A case report

A Case of Extreme Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Beyond the Envelope of Discrepancy, Managed Effectively by a Modified Ortho-Surgical Protocol

Pre- and post-surgical orthodontic treatment of mandibular asymmetry and prognathism]

Combination approach for treatment of mandibular prognathism: Bilateral saggital split osteotomy with pre & post surgical orthodontics

Mandibular Body Osteotomy Combined with Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for the Treatment of Severe Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Ankylosed Teeth

[Combined surgical and orthodontic treatment of severe maxillary anterior teeth and dentoalveolar bone protrusion].

Combined orthodontic and surgical treatment supported by virtual planning in a severe mandibular asymmetry: A case report

Surgical-orthodontic Treatment of Class III Patients with Long Face Problems: a Retrospective Study.

Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment Combined Withsurgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion in an Adult Patient with a Hyperdivergent Skeletal Pattern.

Orthodontic-surgical treatment for severe skeletal class II malocclusion with vertical maxillary excess and four premolars extraction: A case report

Minimal Presurgical Orthodontics for a Skeletal Class III Patient with Mandibular Asymmetry.

Treatment of Severe Open Bite and Mandibular Condyle Anterior Displacement by Mini-Screws and Four Second Molars Extraction: A Case Report

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Treatment Effects and Post-Treatment Stability of Maxillary Molar Intrusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices in Open Bite Malocclusion

Treatment of Osteal Maxillary Protrusion by Combing Orthognathic Surgery with Orthodontic Technique