Is attitude research incompatible with the compatibility principle

Icek Ajzen
2011-02-16
Abstract:Perusing the primary journals of social psychology I am struck by the nature of contemporary research on attitudes and related constructs. In the majority of studies, attitudes, cognitions, affective reactions, and various more or less stable individual differences are treated either as dependent variables or as correlates of other such variables; in relatively few studies are these factors used to predict and explain actual or intended behavior. Thus, current research explores, among many other things, the factors that influence, or correlate with, intergroup stereotyping and prejudice, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, moral judgments, self-esteem, implicit versus explicit attitudes, emotion regulation, and value orientations. I interpret this feature of contemporary attitude research to reflect a general consensus that attitudinal variables are essential determinants of human social behavior and that it is, therefore, important to study their antecedents and the interrelations among them. From a historical perspective, this consensus—if it in fact exists—is most grati-fying, for Iremember a time when social psychologists were criticizing the attitude construct and other broad dispositions for their demonstrated inability to predict actual behavior. That attitude again occupies a central place in social psychological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?