Abstract:When making inferences about the mental lives of others (e.g., others' preferences), it is critical to consider the extent to which the choices we observe are constrained. Prior research on the development of this tendency indicates a contradictory pattern: Children show remarkable sensitivity to constraints in traditional experimental paradigms, yet often fail to consider real‐world constraints and privilege inherent causes instead. We propose that one explanation for this discrepancy may be that real‐world constraints are often stable over time and lose their salience. The present research tested whether children (N = 133, 5‐ to 12‐year‐old mostly US children; 55% female, 45% male) become less sensitive to an actor's constraints after first observing two constrained actors (Stable condition) versus after first observing two actors in contexts with greater choice (Not Stable condition). We crossed the stability of the constraint with the type of constraint: either the constraint was deterministic such that there was only one option available (No Other Option constraint) or, in line with many real‐world constraints, the constraint was probabilistic such that there was another option, but it was difficult to access (Hard to Access constraint). Results indicated that children in the Stable condition became less sensitive to the probabilistic Hard to Access constraint across trials. Notably, we also found that children's sensitivity to constraints was enhanced in the Not Stable condition regardless of whether the constraint was probabilistic or deterministic. We discuss implications for children's sensitivity to real‐world constraints. Research Highlights This research addresses the apparent contradiction that children are sensitive to constraints in experimental paradigms but are often insensitive to constraints in the real world. One explanation for this discrepancy is that constraints in the real world tend to be stable over time and may lose their salience. When probabilistic constraints (i.e., when a second option is available but hard to access) are stable, children become de‐sensitized to constraints across trials. First observing contexts with greater choice increases children's sensitivity to both probabilistic and deterministic constraints.

Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains

How barriers become invisible: Children are less sensitive to constraints that are stable over time

On limitations of learning algorithms in competitive environments

Strategic Teaching and Learning in Games

Young children's understanding of the context-relativity of normative rules in conventional games

Inhibition and young children’s performance on the Tower of London task

A statistical approach to learning constraints

The nonmeek inherit the earth: Children generalize dominance, but not submissiveness.

The Evolution of Domain-General Mechanisms in Intelligence and Learning

Teaching Children's Motor Skills for Team Games Through Guided Discovery: How Constraints Enhance Learning

Teaching Children’s Motor Skills for Team Games Through Guided Discovery: How Constraints Enhance Learning

Solving problems: young children exploring the rules of the game

Acquisition of strategies depending on the opponents' competence level

Trading spaces: computation, representation, and the limits of uninformed learning

Preschoolers' social dominance, moral cognition, and moral behavior: an evolutionary perspective

Preschoolers understand the normativity of cooperatively structured competition

Endogenous Barriers to Learning

Children’s Developing Understanding of the Conventionality of Rules

Not-so-social learning strategies

Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood

The evolutionary consequences of learning under competition