Assessing malingering and personality styles in dissociative identity disorder: a case study

Renzo C. Lanfranco,Juan Carlos Martínez-Aguayo,Marcelo Arancibia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2024.2348218

2024-05-06

Neurocase

Abstract:Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly Multiple Personality Disorder, involves two or more distinct identities controlling behaviour, stemming from trauma-related dissociation. Understanding DID's cognitive, neural, and psychometric aspects remains a challenge, especially in distinguishing genuine cases from malingering. We present a case of a DID patient with nine identities, evaluated to rule out malingering. Using the Millon Index of Personality Styles, we assessed the primary and two alternate identities, revealing marked differences. High consistency scores support validity. We suggest employing personality inventories beyond symptomatology to characterise dissociative identities' consistency and adaptation styles, aiding in malingering assessments in future studies.

psychiatry,clinical neurology,psychology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of distinguishing genuine cases of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) from feigned cases. Specifically, the researchers conducted a case study to evaluate a patient diagnosed with DID, who has 9 different identities, to rule out the possibility of feigning. The researchers used the Millon Index of Personality Styles (MIPS) to assess the primary identity and two alternate identities (one trauma identity and one avoidant identity), finding significant differences between these identities, thereby supporting the validity of the diagnosis.

### Main Issues:
1. **Distinguishing genuine DID cases from feigned cases**: In clinical and forensic evaluations of DID, how to effectively differentiate between genuine DID patients and those pretending to have DID for some benefit.
2. **Assessing consistency and adaptive styles of different identities**: Using personality assessment tools to explore the consistency and adaptive styles of different identities in DID patients to aid in differential diagnosis.

### Research Methods:
- **Case Study**: A detailed evaluation of a DID patient with multiple identities.
- **Personality Assessment Tools**: Using the Millon Index of Personality Styles (MIPS) to assess the primary identity and two alternate identities (trauma identity and avoidant identity).
- **Multidisciplinary Assessment**: Including structured interviews, psychological assessments, and evaluations by multiple independent psychiatrists.

### Key Findings:
- **Significant Differences Between Identities**: MIPS assessment results showed significant differences in personality traits between the primary identity and the two alternate identities, particularly in motivational styles and cognitive styles.
- **High Consistency Scores**: High consistency scores supported the validity of the assessment results, indicating that these identities are genuinely present rather than feigned.

### Conclusion:
The researchers suggest that future DID assessments should include personality assessment tools to evaluate the consistency and adaptive styles of different identities, in addition to symptomatology assessments, to improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis.