Dispositional Traits, Characteristic Adaptations, and Narrative Identity Reconstructions in Individuals With Depersonalization and Derealization

Emanuele Fino,Thalia Jemmett‐Skinner,Richard Evans‐Miller,Joe Perkins,Mohammed Malik,Martin Robinson,Gwendalyn Webb
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12976
IF: 5.429
2024-10-19
Journal of Personality
Abstract:Introduction Depersonalization and derealization disorder (DPDR) is a debilitating condition. To date, little was known about the role of personality structure and of perceived social support and loneliness in DPDR. Methods Three studies investigated, respectively: (i) broadband personality traits (five‐factor model), maladaptive trait domains (PID‐5), and perceived support and loneliness in individuals with self‐reported DPDR (N = 160) versus a general population sample (N = 303), using network modeling; (ii) structure and interconnectivity of personality, perceived support and loneliness, and DPDR traits (frequency/duration) in individuals with self‐reported DPDR (N = 160); (iii) characteristic adaptations and narrative identities in individuals with self‐reported DPDR (N = 19), using thematic analysis. Results Study 1 found between‐samples differences across several traits, especially psychoticism and negative affect. Differences in networks' global centrality, but not structures or edges, were also found. The graphical model in Study 2 showed a community of dissociative tendencies including DPDR traits and psychoticism. Study 3 highlighted the development of DPDR as a key life transition for those experiencing it, with narratives focusing on feelings of poor agency, isolation, and a disrupted sense of self. Conclusions Individual differences in personality characterize DPDR, especially in psychoticism. Implications for theory and research are discussed.
psychology, social
What problem does this paper attempt to address?