Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conduct a comparative study of the surface modifications induced by two different lasers on a 2050‐T8 aluminum alloy, with a specific consideration of residual stress and work‐hardening levels. Design/methodology/approach Two lasers have been used for Laser shock peening (LSP) treatment in water‐confined regime: a Continuum Powerlite Plus laser, operating at 0.532 mm with 9 ns laser pulses, and near 1.5mm spot diameters; a new generation Gaia‐R Thales laser delivering 10 J‐10 ns impacts, with 4‐6mm homogeneous laser spots at 1.06 mm. Surface deformation, work‐hardening levels and residual stresses were analyzed for both LSP conditions. Residual stresses were compared with numerical simulations using a 3D finite element (FE) model, starting with the validation of surface deformations induced by a single laser impact. Findings Similar surface deformations and work‐hardening levels, but relatively lower residual stresses were obtained with the new large 4‐6 mm impact configuration. This was attributed to a reduced number of local cyclic loadings (2) compared with the small impact configuration (4). Additionally, more anisotropic stresses were obtained with small impacts. FE simulations using Johnson‐Cook's material' behavior were shown to simulate accurately surface deformations, but to overestimate maximum stress levels. Research limitations/implications This work should provide LSP workers a better understanding of the possible benefits from the different LSP configurations currently co‐existing: using small ( 4‐5 mm). Moreover, experimental results and simulated data had never been presented on 2050‐T8 Al alloy. Originality/value An experimental (and numerical) comparison using two distinct laser sources for LSP, has never been presented before. This preliminary work should help LSP workers to choose adequate sources.

Implementation of the Almen intensity for the characterization of laser shock peening

Laser shock processing with two different laser sources on 2050‐T8 aluminum alloy

Measurement of Laser Shock Peening induced residual stress by nanoindentation and comparison with XRD technique

Laser Peening Process and Its Impact on Materials Properties in Comparison with Shot Peening and Ultrasonic Impact Peening

Online Evaluation of Surface Hardness for Aluminum Alloy in LSP Using Modal Acoustic Emission

The Influence of Absorbing Coating Material on the Efficiency of Laser Shock Peening

Laser shock processing of aluminium alloys. Application to high cycle fatigue behaviour

Analysis of laser shock waves and resulting surface deformations in an Al–Cu–Li aluminum alloy

Laser Shock Peening of Ti6Al4V Alloy with Combined Nanosecond and Femtosecond Laser Pulses

Effects of sacrificial coating material in laser shock peening of L-PBF printed AlSi10Mg

A Comprehensive Review on Finite Element Analysis of Laser Shock Peening

Laser shock peening induced mechanical properties enhancement of 50CrVA alloy

Laser shock peening regulating aluminum alloy surface residual stresses for enhancing the mechanical properties: Roles of shock number and energy

Effect of multipath laser shock processing on microhardness, surface roughness, and wear resistance of 2024-T3 Al alloy

Effects of Laser Shock Peening on Corrosion Resistance of Additive Manufactured AlSi10Mg

Laser Shock Peening and its Applications: A Review

Numerical Investigation of Residual Stress Field Induced by Array-Type Laser Shock Peening

Effect of Preliminary Heat Treatment on the Formation of Structure and Residual Stresses in the AMg6 Alloy at Laser Shock Peening Without Coating

Non-contact Measurements of Residual Stress Distribution and Grain Size in Titanium Alloys with Laser Ultrasonic System

Numerical investigation on spall fracture in a metallic material caused by laser shock peening

Subsurface hardening of Al irradiated with ultrafast infrared laser