Liquid hydrogen, methylcyclohexane, and ammonia as potential hydrogen storage: Comparison review

Agung Tri Wijayanta,Takuya Oda,Chandra Wahyu Purnomo,Takao Kashiwagi,Muhammad Aziz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.112
IF: 7.2
2019-06-01
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Abstract:<p>Among the several candidates of hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) storage, liquid H<sub>2</sub>, methylcyclohexane (MCH), and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) are considered as potential hydrogen carriers, especially in Japan, in terms of their characteristics, application feasibility, and economic performance. In addition, as the main mover in the introduction of H<sub>2</sub>, Japan has focused on the storage of H<sub>2</sub>, which can be categorized into these three methods. Each of them has advantages and disadvantages compared to the other. Liquid H<sub>2</sub> faces challenges in the huge energy consumption that occurs during liquefaction and in the loss of H<sub>2</sub> through boil-off during storage. MCH has its main obstacles in requiring a large amount of energy in dehydrogenation. Finally, NH<sub>3</sub> encounters high energy demand in both synthesis and decomposition (if required). In terms of energy efficiency, NH<sub>3</sub> is predicted to have the highest total energy efficiency, followed by liquid H<sub>2</sub>, and MCH. In addition, from the calculation of cost, NH<sub>3</sub> with direct utilization (without decomposition) is considered to have the highest feasibility for massive adoption, as it shows the lowest cost (20–22 JPY·Nm<sup>3</sup>-H<sub>2</sub> in 2050), which is close to the government target of H<sub>2</sub> cost (20 JPY·Nm<sup>3</sup>-H<sub>2</sub> in 2050). However, in the case that highly pure H<sub>2</sub> (such as for fuel cell) is needed, liquid H<sub>2</sub> looks to be promising (24–25 JPY·Nm<sup>3</sup>-H<sub>2</sub> in 2050), compared with MCH and NH<sub>3</sub> with decomposition and purification.</p>
energy & fuels,electrochemistry,chemistry, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?