Abstract:For 50 years positive peace has served as an aspirational goal for many scholars and practitioners of peace. However, much recent scholarly literature evidences a substantial ambivalence toward this ambition, suggesting that prominent theories, policies and practices in the field have failed to support positive peace. This article argues that a key reason for this shortcoming is the field’s failure to respond adequately to the evolving character of conflict (latent and overt) related to technological, legal and economic changes associated with the consolidation of globalization over this period. This consolidation has served to shrink the distances between previously remote actors, to expand exponentially the influence of many institutions, norms, practices and projects as they penetrate new societies, to concentrate power into the hands of ever fewer actors, and to reify instead of deconstruct endemic inequality and marginalization within states, between states, and across the globe. The failure of the field to respond robustly to these changes also prompts concerns about its ability to face sweeping challenges soon to come related to technological innovation, climate change, demographic shifts, labour automation and the search for new governance models. This article, therefore, reaffirms the aspirational goals of peace and conflict studies by building on Lederach’s earlier Peacebuilding Triangle to propose a Trans-Scalar Peace System which would recognize the need for coherent and supplementary policies and actions across scales (global, regional, international, nation and local) and utilize a backward-mapping approach to promote a parity of esteem for actors, institutions and decisions at each scale which would, at the same time, privilege the voice of those with the most pertinent knowledge, experience and capacity for action in support of any given policy or practice. Such an approach would honour the lessons of the ‘local turn’ while developing a global trans-scalar peace system.

Cultural technologies for peace may have shaped our social cognition

Evolution, culture, and the possibility of peace

Interacting for Peace: Rethinking Peace Through Interactive Digital Platforms

Perceptual Gestalt at War

A silent emergence of culture: The social tuning effect.

Creating shared goals and experiences as a pathway to peace

Is peace a human phenomenon?

Ambition and ambivalence: Reconsidering positive peace as a trans-scalar peace system

Classifying Peace in Global Media Using RAG and Intergroup Reciprocity

Mutual benefits of social learning and algorithmic mediation for cumulative culture

When the digits don't add up: Research strategies for post-digital peacebuilding

Religious Culture in Peacebuilding Education

Communities in Affiliation Networks with Attitudunal Actors

The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture

'Our Roots Run Deep': Historical Myths as Culturally Evolved Technologies for Coalitional Recruitment

The Peace Mediator Effect

The Emergence of Cultural Attractors: How Dynamic Populations of Learners Achieve Collective Cognitive Alignment

Developmental Psychology and Peace

Culture in Action: Unpacking Capacities to Inform Assets-Based Design

Impediments to peace

The evolution of peace (and war) is driven by an elementary social interaction mechanism