Abstract:SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 10, Issue 2 , Page 394-429, January 2019. In the existing literature of robust utility maximization with ambiguity, agents are generally assumed to be extremely ambiguity-averse as they tend to only consider expected payoffs in the worst-case scenario. However, experimental studies have shown that agents' attitude to ambiguity is not systematically negative and can even be ambiguity-seeking when they consider themselves knowledgeable or competent. To conceptually distinguish between an agent's perception of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion, the so-called $\alpha$-maxmin expected utility ($\alpha$-MEU) was proposed in the economics literature as a linear aggregation of the most and least favorable prior beliefs. Although the axiomatic characterization of $\alpha$-MEU has been well studied, there has been little work on the benchmark maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU. The main difficulty stems from the dynamic inconsistency of two distinct extreme priors and nonconvexity (and nonconcavity) of the value function. In this paper, we study the maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU and solve for the equilibrium strategies of open-loop type. Under logarithmic risk preference, we obtain the explicit form of equilibrium investment strategies, which involves a two-dimensional system of fully coupled quadratic backward stochastic differential equations (BSDE). The main challenge in completing the verification theorem is to study the existence, uniqueness, and stability of this system of BSDE. For this purpose, we consider a general Markov model of the financial market, which leads to a system of quadratic Markovian BSDE. We find that the equilibrium investment strategy becomes more conservative if the agent is more ambiguity-averse or the agent perceives more ambiguity in the financial market. The equilibrium strategy is close to the classical nonrobust strategy (without ambiguity) if the agent is ambiguity-neutral. As time approaches maturity, ambiguity-seeking (ambiguity-averse) agents adopt more aggressive (conservative) equilibrium strategies. Additionally, the equilibrium strategy of an ambiguity-neutral agent converges to the classical nonrobust strategy at maturity.

Limit Orders and Knightian Uncertainty

A Class of Solvable Multidimensional Stopping Problems in the Presence of Knightian Uncertainty

Asset Prices Under Knightian Uncertainty

A Note on Kuhn's Theorem with Ambiguity Averse Players

Uncertainty, Information Acquisition, and Price Swings in Asset Markets

Brownian equilibria under Knightian uncertainty

Probabilistic aspects of finance

Portfolio Choices and Asset Prices under EUUP: The Comparative Statics Analysis

Equilibrium Strategies for Alpha-Maxmin Expected Utility Maximization

Ambiguity, randomization and the timing of resolution of uncertainty

Time is Money: The Equilibrium Trading Horizon and Optimal Arrival Price

Optimal investment in ambiguous financial markets with learning

Dynamically Consistent α-Maxmin Expected Utility

Return Ambiguity, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing

Dynamically consistent alpha‐maxmin expected utility

Uncertainty Principles in Risk Finance

Robust Utility Maximization with Drift and Volatility Uncertainty

Randomization advice and ambiguity aversion

Optimal Stopping under Model Ambiguity: a Time-Consistent Equilibrium Approach

Prudence attitude and limited participation

Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time