Abstract:Over the last twenty five years, the perspective of health care financing has dramatically changed in developing countries. In this context, it is worth reviewing the literature and the experiences in order to understand the major shifts on this topic. During the sixties, health care policies focused on fighting major epidemics. Programs were dedicated to reduce the threat to population health. Financing related to the mobilization of resources for these programs and most of them were not managed within national administrations. The success of these policies was not sustainable. After Alma Ata, primary health care became a priority but it took some years before the management of the health care district was introduced as a major topic. In the eighties, with the district policy and the Bamako Initiative, the economic approach became a major part of all health care policies. At that time, most of health care financing was related to cost recovery strategies. All the attention was then drawn on how it worked: Fee policies, distribution of revenues, efficient use of resources and so on. In the second half of the nineties, cost recovery was relegated to the back scene, health care financing policy then becoming a major front scene matter. Two major reasons may explain this change in perspective: HIV which causes a major burden on the whole health system, and fighting poverty in relation with debts reduction. In most developing countries, with high HIV prevalence, access to care is no longer possible within the framework of the ongoing heath care financing scheme. Health plays a major role in poverty reduction strategies but health care officials must take into account every aspect of public financing. New facts also have to be taken into account: Decentralization/autonomy policies, the growing role of third party payment and the rising number of qualified health care professionals. All these facts, along with a broader emphasis given to the market, introduce a need for a better management of resources through financing mechanisms. Some major reports from WHO and the World Bank are the landmarks of the evolution on how to approach health care financing: The 1993 World Bank report on investing in health, the 2000 WHO report on health in the world and the WHO report on macroeconomics and health. In this early millenium, there is a general agreement on some major aspects of health care financing such as: Lack of resources for financing health care; cost recovery as a part of any sustainable health care system; health as a public good needing some extended subsidies; protecting people from the burden of disease as a part of financing schemes; equity in relation with the public private mix at the center of many debates; financing as a key mechanism for the regulation of the whole health care system and not only as a resource mobilization; HIV in bringing up new problems clearly shows how all these matters are related. Health care financing is at the heart of ongoing questions on health care reforms. Although developing countries have low insurance coverage and weak modern medical care, they share the same questions as developed countries: How to promote technical and allocative efficiency? What place for incentives? What role for the public sector? How can market and contracting bring results? What progress through stewardship and better governance?

Planning in the health sector: for whom, by whom?

Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia

From privatization to health system strengthening: how different International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank policies impact health in developing countries

The influence of power and actor relations on priority setting and resource allocation practices at the hospital level in Kenya: a case study

Spatial Plans as a Critical Intervention in Improving Population Health. A Discourse Arising from a Health Census Review of the State of Current Local Planning Policy in England

Power and the people's health

What affects how Chinese patients wish to be involved in health care delivery? Perspectives of the Chinese policy and institutional contexts

The Value of Planning

Health Equity as a Guide for Urban Planning

The role of private healthcare sector actors in health service delivery and financing policy processes in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Forget planning, put politics first? Priorities for urban management in developing countries

Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study

Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries

[Evolution and new perspectives of health care financing in developing countries]

Heard and valued: the development of a model to meaningfully engage marginalized populations in health services planning

The legal path for priority setting in Chile: a critical analysis to improve health planning and stewardship

Was priority setting considered in COVID-19 response planning? A global comparative analysis

Title Health Priority-Setting For Overseas Development Assistance in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: A Comparative Case Study of Ethiopia, Nigeria and Tanzania

Self-interest, positional concerns and distributional considerations in healthcare preferences

Evaluation framework study assessing the role, applicability and adherence to good practice of planning support tools for allocation of development aid for health in low-income and middle-income countries

Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice